Commit 28f7d528 authored by Florian Fainelli's avatar Florian Fainelli Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

net: dsa: Fix NPD checking for br_vlan_enabled()

[ Upstream not applicable ]

It is possible for the DSA slave network device not to be part of a
bridge, yet have an upper device like a VLAN device be part of a bridge.
When that VLAN device is enslaved, since it does not define any
switchdev_ops, we will recurse down to the lower/physical port device,
call switchdev_port_obj_add() with a VLAN, and here we will check
br_vlan_enabled() on a NULL dp->bridge_dev, thus causing a NULL pointer
de-reference.

This is no longer a problem upstream after commit d17d9f5e
("switchdev: Replace port obj add/del SDO with a notification").

Fixes: 2ea7a679 ("net: dsa: Don't add vlans when vlan filtering is disabled")
Reported-by: default avatarFrank Wunderlich <frank-w@public-files.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent 671f2db5
......@@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ int dsa_port_vlan_add(struct dsa_port *dp,
if (netif_is_bridge_master(vlan->obj.orig_dev))
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
if (br_vlan_enabled(dp->bridge_dev))
if (dp->bridge_dev && br_vlan_enabled(dp->bridge_dev))
return dsa_port_notify(dp, DSA_NOTIFIER_VLAN_ADD, &info);
return 0;
......@@ -273,7 +273,7 @@ int dsa_port_vlan_del(struct dsa_port *dp,
if (netif_is_bridge_master(vlan->obj.orig_dev))
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
if (br_vlan_enabled(dp->bridge_dev))
if (dp->bridge_dev && br_vlan_enabled(dp->bridge_dev))
return dsa_port_notify(dp, DSA_NOTIFIER_VLAN_DEL, &info);
return 0;
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment