Commit e67b8a68 authored by Edward Cree's avatar Edward Cree Committed by David S. Miller

bpf/verifier: reject BPF_ALU64|BPF_END

Neither ___bpf_prog_run nor the JITs accept it.
Also adds a new test case.

Fixes: 17a52670 ("bpf: verifier (add verifier core)")
Signed-off-by: Edward Cree's avatarEdward Cree <[email protected]>
Acked-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Acked-by: default avatarDaniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <[email protected]>
parent 8c7c19a5
......@@ -2292,7 +2292,8 @@ static int check_alu_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn)
}
} else {
if (insn->src_reg != BPF_REG_0 || insn->off != 0 ||
(insn->imm != 16 && insn->imm != 32 && insn->imm != 64)) {
(insn->imm != 16 && insn->imm != 32 && insn->imm != 64) ||
BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_ALU64) {
verbose("BPF_END uses reserved fields\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
......
......@@ -6629,6 +6629,22 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.result = REJECT,
.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"invalid 64-bit BPF_END",
.insns = {
BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
{
.code = BPF_ALU64 | BPF_END | BPF_TO_LE,
.dst_reg = BPF_REG_0,
.src_reg = 0,
.off = 0,
.imm = 32,
},
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.errstr = "BPF_END uses reserved fields",
.result = REJECT,
},
};
static int probe_filter_length(const struct bpf_insn *fp)
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment