Commit cd74c86b authored by Paul Mackerras's avatar Paul Mackerras Committed by Ingo Molnar

perf_counter, powerpc, sparc: Fix compilation after perf_counter_overflow() change

Commit 5622f295 ("x86, perf_counter, bts: Optimize BTS overflow
handling") removed the regs field from struct perf_sample_data and
added a regs parameter to perf_counter_overflow().  This breaks the
build on powerpc (and Sparc) as reported by Sachin Sant:

  arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_counter.c: In function 'record_and_restart':
  arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_counter.c:1165: error: unknown field 'regs' specified in initializer

This adjusts arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_counter.c to correspond with the
new struct perf_sample_data and perf_counter_overflow().

[ v2: also fix Sparc, Markus Metzger <markus.t.metzger@intel.com> ]
Reported-by: default avatarSachin Sant <sachinp@in.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Markus Metzger <markus.t.metzger@intel.com>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <19127.8400.376239.586120@drongo.ozlabs.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
parent a1792cda
......@@ -1162,7 +1162,6 @@ static void record_and_restart(struct perf_counter *counter, unsigned long val,
*/
if (record) {
struct perf_sample_data data = {
.regs = regs,
.addr = 0,
.period = counter->hw.last_period,
};
......@@ -1170,7 +1169,7 @@ static void record_and_restart(struct perf_counter *counter, unsigned long val,
if (counter->attr.sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_ADDR)
perf_get_data_addr(regs, &data.addr);
if (perf_counter_overflow(counter, nmi, &data)) {
if (perf_counter_overflow(counter, nmi, &data, regs)) {
/*
* Interrupts are coming too fast - throttle them
* by setting the counter to 0, so it will be
......
......@@ -493,7 +493,6 @@ static int __kprobes perf_counter_nmi_handler(struct notifier_block *self,
regs = args->regs;
data.regs = regs;
data.addr = 0;
cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_counters);
......@@ -513,7 +512,7 @@ static int __kprobes perf_counter_nmi_handler(struct notifier_block *self,
if (!sparc_perf_counter_set_period(counter, hwc, idx))
continue;
if (perf_counter_overflow(counter, 1, &data))
if (perf_counter_overflow(counter, 1, &data, regs))
sparc_pmu_disable_counter(hwc, idx);
}
......
......@@ -849,23 +849,6 @@ static inline void perf_counter_comm(struct task_struct *tsk) { }
static inline void perf_counter_fork(struct task_struct *tsk) { }
static inline void perf_counter_init(void) { }
static inline int
perf_output_begin(struct perf_output_handle *handle, struct perf_counter *c,
unsigned int size, int nmi, int sample) { }
static inline void perf_output_end(struct perf_output_handle *handle) { }
static inline void
perf_output_copy(struct perf_output_handle *handle,
const void *buf, unsigned int len) { }
static inline void
perf_output_sample(struct perf_output_handle *handle,
struct perf_event_header *header,
struct perf_sample_data *data,
struct perf_counter *counter) { }
static inline void
perf_prepare_sample(struct perf_event_header *header,
struct perf_sample_data *data,
struct perf_counter *counter,
struct pt_regs *regs) { }
#endif
#define perf_output_put(handle, x) \
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment