Level of quality for pictures
(Can't find back the previous discussions beyond the GT CNIG Cryptpad so I'm creating an issue here)
In order to offer a better re-usability for our pictures, we may characterize their level of quality. Something like a score for each picture (and sequence ?) of quality, with 5 levels (like Nutriscore) :
It could be split into sub-scores.
Positioning score
How precisely the picture is positioned :
- A : <= 1m (RTK)
- B : <= 2m (DGPS)
- C : <= 5m (hiking GPS)
- D : <= 10m (smartphone GPS)
- E : > 10m (very bad)
Image resolution score
How precise the picture is (in terms of resolution) (updated 9/10/2024) :
| Score | Flat pic (70° FOV) | 360 pic |
|---|---|---|
| A | Can't be A | >= 33MP |
| B | >= 33MP | >= 8MP |
| C | >= 8MP | < 8MP |
| D | >= 2MP | Can't be D |
| E | < 2MP | Can't be E |
Any field of view between flat and 360° (partial panoramas, wide-angle flat pictures) will have a proportional resolution requirement.
Note : this score could evolve in the future to also qualify its readability (contrast, light...).
General score
General score is a mix of both positioning and resolution scores. The formula is :
round(res*2/3+gps/3)
(With A-score = 5, E-score = 1)
Examples :
| Res | GPS | Overall |
|---|---|---|
| A | A | A |
| A | E | B |
| C | A | B |
| D | C | B |
| E | D | E |
