minor typo in comments of ppllj_ew.m

https://www.physik.uzh.ch/data/openloops/repositories/public/processes/2/ppllj_ew.m

mentions under (* L+L- *) section the processes (* eexuux *), which I think is the wrong comment since in the channels.db they are given as ppllj_ew llxuux. I guess this has no effects on anything.

How do I instruct openloops to use llxuux for mumu with masses instead of defaultign to eexuux? Without flavour_mapping I get:

[OpenLoops] registering process: -5 5 -> -13 13
[OpenLoops] check process library for: mmxbbx, -5,5,13,-13
[OpenLoops] Requested library not installed. Checking collection...
[OpenLoops] register_process: process -5 5 -> -13 13 @ tree=2,0 (EW,QCD) not found!

and with flavour_mapping it goes to the electron case:

[OpenLoops] registering process: -5 5 -> -13 13
[OpenLoops] Flavour mapping. Original (all ingoing) process: -5,5,13,-13
[OpenLoops] Flavour mapping. Mapped (all ingoing) process:   -5,5,11,-11
[OpenLoops] check process library for: eexbbx, -5,5,11,-11
[OpenLoops] Following info-file mapping: eexbbx --> eexddx[].
[OpenLoops] Parameters do not match info-file for process eexddx_1 in library ppllj
[OpenLoops] Parameters do not match info-file for process eexddx_2 in library ppllj
[OpenLoops] Parameters do not match info-file for process eexbbx_1 in library ppllj_ew
[OpenLoops] Parameters do not match info-file for process eexbbx_2 in library ppllj_ew
[OpenLoops] Parameters do not match info-file for process eexbbx_3 in library ppllj_ew
[OpenLoops] Following info-file mapping: eexbbx --> eexddx[].
[OpenLoops] Following info-file mapping: eexbbx --> eexddx[].
[OpenLoops] Following info-file mapping: eexbbx --> eexddx[].
[OpenLoops] Following info-file mapping: eexbbx --> eexddx[].
[OpenLoops] Parameters do match info-file for process eexddx in library libopenloops_ppllj_lt.so
[OpenLoops] Library loaded: -5 5 -> -13 13      @ tree=2,0 (EW,QCD) >  ppllj_eexddx_1[4,3,1,2] (id=1) (mapped from eexbbx)

Is there an easy way to map the muon to the tau case?

Cheers, APN

EDIT: I strokethrough all the stuff unrelated to the actual typo of this issue.