Please follow the CodingStyle for the project, including proper
Give your patch a filename using the convention:
patch-version.initials.description.revision where version is
the Mutt version the patch is targetted at, initials are the initials
(first and last) for your name, description is a short (two words at
the max) title for the patch (use underscores if needed), and revision
is the version of the patch starting at 1.
An example of the above is patch-1.5.1.me.long_qp.1. Put this into
the file PATCHES in the Mutt source code before running diff, so it gets
included. The output will look similar to this:
--- PATCHES~ Tue Nov 6 19:59:33 2001 +++ PATCHES Tue Nov 6 19:59:42 2001 @@ -1,0 +1 @@ +patch-1.5.1.me.long_qp.1
This information gets included in the mutt -v output so that when
users complain about bugs, we know who to blame. :-)
Mutt contains a number of safety wrappers around standard library
functions. Their use can be tested and verified by running the following
script from the top-level source directory:
It will run some basic security checks and prints warnings you should
fix prior to submitting the patch; a committer will run these checks
anyway so ensuring your patch is okay may prevent it from being rejected
due to such "violations".
A list of insecure or (under certain conditions) problematic functions
can be obtained with:
$ grep safe_ lib.h
Note that a patch may get rejected if their standard library
"equivalents" are used.
safe_free() vs. FREE()
Mutt contains a safe_free() wrapper for the ordinary free() and a macro
around safe_free() named FREE(). To avoid compiler warnings, the
safe_free() function though declared as:
safe_free (void* pointer);
expects "void**", not "void*" and dereferences its argument. The
direct usage hence requires some care so that the FREE() macro was
introduced. It is to be used as this:
char* foo = ... FREE (&foo);
so that the check_sec.sh script can properly test whether FREE() gets
"void**" instead of "void*".
When hacking on mutt (especially for the first time), please
double-check the use of FREE() and avoid safe_free().
Unified diffs (diff -u) are easier to read for those reviewing the
patches. If you are using Mercurial
will give you a recursive diff of all files that you have changed.
Send your patch to firstname.lastname@example.org. Prefix the subject of the message
with [PATCH] so that it is easily identifiable in a list of
If your patch doesn't get included in vanilla mutt, you might consider
adding a pointer to your patch on the PatchList page so others can find