RFC057: Legal Interoperability - International trade and B2G scenario's
## Background and rationale
The International Chamber of Commerce has a series of pre-defined commercial terms widely accepted in parties participating in international trader. Example are 'INCOTERMS'. The BDI aims to have participants strengthen their supply chain by highly trusted more flexible data exchange supporting their existing business and practices. The current legal basis, which is deemed an asset of iSHARE for 'quick' but well defined multilateral agreements is limiting by being routes in Dutch Private Law. This limited it's application when it concerns international trade as well the role that a party as custom or ILT will play in these transaction. The international parties want to apply international treaties and Govermental bodies can't (!) adhere to private law provisions.
## Proposed change: purpose
Add ability for parties to publish alternatives such as widely used United Nations Treaty Collection (600+ provisions). The licenses might still apply, but the accession agreement, if not mistaken, is based on Dutch Private Law. The base law needs to be an option to insert and select. Parties needs to have option to propose which basis is used in the transaction. Data Space Authorities need to choose which they support as part of their obligations for that datasapce is support the resolution process if the license is not adhered to by the data consumer (or service provider).
## Proposed change: considerations and requirements
Inventory of fitting and used legal provision:
United Nations Treaty Collection
ICC INCOTERMS
Rotterdam Rules
Transport Legislation
etc.
issue