Evaluate current tiering of Monitor stage features
The purpose of this feature is to evaluate that the current feature-set for the Monitor stage is placed in the correct tier and ensure we are not missing opportunities that would have a positive impact towards IACV. Current Product~9770269 features: | Feature | Tier | Category |Proposed Change? | |----------------------------------------------|----------|--------------------------|------------------| | Application performance Monitoring | Core | metrics | | | Application performance alerts | Ultimate | metrics |**Core** - necessary to complete the DevOps loop| | GitLab Self-monitoring | Core | metrics | | | Cloud native monitoring | Core | metrics | | | Server Monitoring | Core | metrics | | | ~~Logs~~ | ~~Ultimate~~ `core` | metrics |**Starter** | | Omnibus package supports log forwarding | Starter | logging | | | Audit Logs | Premium | logging | | | Tracing | Ultimate | tracing |**Starter** - would be purchased by manager to help team maintain SLOs | | Kubernetes Cluster Monitoring | Ultimate | cluster_monitoring |**Premium** - Advanced Kubernetes management| | Error Tracking | Core | error_tracking | | | Incident Management | ? | incident_management |Features are split across tiers| | Synthetic Monitoring | N/A | synthetic_monitoring |WILL BE: Ultimate| | Status Page | N/A | status_page |WILL BE: Ultimate - Value Stream Management | | Custom metrics | Ultimate | metrics | CE | **Tiers**: core, starter, premium, ultimate **Categories**: Metrics, Tracing, Logging, Incident Management, Cluster Monitoring, Error Tracking, Synthetic Monitoring, Status Page ## Reasoning **Change X from A to B tier**
epic