Evaluate current tiering of Monitor stage features
The purpose of this feature is to evaluate that the current feature-set for the Monitor stage is placed in the correct tier and ensure we are not missing opportunities that would have a positive impact towards IACV.
Current Product~9770269 features:
| Feature | Tier | Category |Proposed Change? |
|----------------------------------------------|----------|--------------------------|------------------|
| Application performance Monitoring | Core | metrics | |
| Application performance alerts | Ultimate | metrics |**Core** - necessary to complete the DevOps loop|
| GitLab Self-monitoring | Core | metrics | |
| Cloud native monitoring | Core | metrics | |
| Server Monitoring | Core | metrics | |
| ~~Logs~~ | ~~Ultimate~~ `core` | metrics |**Starter** |
| Omnibus package supports log forwarding | Starter | logging | |
| Audit Logs | Premium | logging | |
| Tracing | Ultimate | tracing |**Starter** - would be purchased by manager to help team maintain SLOs |
| Kubernetes Cluster Monitoring | Ultimate | cluster_monitoring |**Premium** - Advanced Kubernetes management|
| Error Tracking | Core | error_tracking | |
| Incident Management | ? | incident_management |Features are split across tiers|
| Synthetic Monitoring | N/A | synthetic_monitoring |WILL BE: Ultimate|
| Status Page | N/A | status_page |WILL BE: Ultimate - Value Stream Management |
| Custom metrics | Ultimate | metrics | CE |
**Tiers**: core, starter, premium, ultimate
**Categories**: Metrics, Tracing, Logging, Incident Management, Cluster Monitoring, Error Tracking, Synthetic Monitoring, Status Page
## Reasoning
**Change X from A to B tier**
epic