Improve code readability by renaming struct fields of priority_st
For priorities we use
typedef struct { unsigned int priority[MAX_ALGOS]; unsigned int algorithms; } priority_st;
which is defined in gnutls_int.h. This struct has field names that are unclear (IMO).
- priorities is an array and should therefore be called priorities (plural)
- algorithms contains the length of priority and should therefore better be called num_priorities or count.
Do we agree on this? I think updating this struct will improve code readability.