What is the policy/attitude towards LLM contributions in GNU CLISP?
@bhaible
Hi, I'm looking over all the active Lisp, Scheme and Lisp-adjacent languages and implementations to see how projects contributors and maintainers are responding to the proliferation of LLMs. I don't see anything that resembles an official 'policy' or guideline to LLM-generated/assisted/enhanced/based/etc contributions.
Are LLM contributions welcomed in GNU CLISP by the maintainers and contributors?
issue