Question on generating two local PRNs (one of them inverted)
Created by: fgallardo
Hi there,
This is not a problem/issue, but a question. Maybe it is quite simple and the question is stupid (sorry for that if this is the case).
Why are you generating two local versions of the PRN code, one of them inverted?
I mean, if I am not wrongly interpreting the code: You generate the local PRN code at fs, then FFT, then conjugate. So far, so good.
But why are you generating a second local PRN, this time inverted?
Thanks a lot and sorry for bothering!
BR Fran