Better documentation for the Quad Planning process
Problem
The current level of documentation on how to accomplish quad planning is minimal. As a result, SETs are performing the work in an ad hoc manner which may lead to inconsistencies and missed opportunities to provide quality feedback.
Proposal
Develop better documentation that helps define:
- the process
- the theory behind quad planning to enable SETs to speak to its benefits to their stable counterparts
- tools that can help with analysis of features and development of a test strategy
Considerations
We want to avoid this becoming process heavy while at the same time equipping SETs with the information, capabilities, and tooling to accomplish this work.
Looking for feedback from the quality team especially to help avoid burdening DRIs with process or overwhelming with information.
Edited by Zeff Morgan