Follow-up from "Draft: Initial draft of broken master documentation"

The following discussion from !14 (merged) should be addressed:

• @ddieulivol started a discussion: (+2 comments)

  question (non-blocking): Do you think we could create description templates for the two kinds of issues we need to create with the appropriate labels?

  

  First template: broken master - non-flaky reason

  /label ~"master:broken", ~"Engineering Productivity",~priority::1, ~severity::1

  master failing for a non-flaky reason - create an issue with the following labels: master:broken, Engineering Productivity,priority1, severity1.

  Second template: broken master - flaky reason

  /label ~"failure::flaky-test", ~"Engineering Productivity",~priority::2, ~severity::2

  master failing for a flaky reason that cannot be reliably reproduced - create an issue with the following labels: failureflaky-test, Engineering Productivity,priority2, severity2.