[UX] Provide users a way to review, manage, and customize individual workspace environments
MR: Pending <!-- The first line of this issue description must be one of the following: 1. `MR: Pending` 2. `MR: <MR link with trailing +>`, 3. If there are multiple MRs: ``` MRs: - <MR 1 link with trailing +>` - <MR 2 link with trailing +>` - ... ``` 4. `MR: No MR` ...and the first description line of the MR should be `Issue: <Issue link with trailing +>` For more context, see: https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/development/dev/create/ide/index.html#relationship-of-issues-to-mrs --> <!-- The following sections should be filled out as part of the refinement process before the issue is prioritized. For more context, see: https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/development/dev/create/ide/#2-pre-iteration-planning-meeting --> ## Description Discussion #467418 revealed that we need to give users a way to review, manage, and customize individual workspace environments. More context: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/467418#note_1985647299 Open questions: - Does the description accurately describe the problem? - Are there any specific constraints or requirements to be aware of? - Do we have customer requests for this feature or is it being driven by an anticipated future need? ## Acceptance Criteria TODO: Fill out (required) - [ ] [Describe what must be achieved to complete this issue.] ## Technical Requirements TODO: Fill out or delete (optional) [If applicable, please list out any technical requirements for this feature/enhancement.] ## Design Requirements - Problem definition needed - Possible solutions - A linkable workspace page/view that allows us to provide granular workspace information and customization options to users. <!-- Replace with other type, e.g. bug or maintenance, if appropriate --> <!-- Replace with other subtype if appropriate --> <!-- By default, all issues start in the unprioritized status. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/development/dev/create/ide/#-remote-development-planning-process --> <!-- For simplicity and to avoid triage bot warnings about missing workflow labels, we will default to issues starting at the refinement phase -->
issue