MR: Pending <!-- The first line of the MR must be one of the following: 1. `MR: Pending` 2. `MR: <MR link with trailing +>`, and the first description line of the MR should be `Issue: <Issue link with trailing +>` 3. `MR: No MR` For more context, see: https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/development/dev/create/ide/index.html#1-to-1-relationship-of-issues-to-mrs --> <!-- The following sections should be filled out as part of the refinement process before the issue is prioritized. For more context, see: https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/development/dev/create/ide/#2-pre-iteration-planning-meeting --> ## Description The following discussion from !141376 should be addressed: - [ ] @vtak started a [discussion](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/141376#note_1724647515): (+1 comment) > Thanks @a_akgun . Overall, LGTM. Just a couple of questions/comments before we move ahead on this. > > I noticed the following while exploratory testing this > > - `workspaces_quota` and `workspaces_per_user_quota` respected. > - When the value for these quota is 0, the message sounds odd. (Check screenshot). Let's create a followup and tag our Design counterpart to see what their thoughts are. >  >  > > So functionality wise, it works as advertised :thumbsup: ## Acceptance Criteria TODO: Fill out (required) - [ ] [Describe what must be achieved to complete this issue.] - [ ] [Describe another requirement needed to complete this issue.] - [ ] [Add additional acceptance criteria as needed.] ## Technical Requirements TODO: Fill out or delete [If applicable, please list out any technical requirements for this feature/enhancement.] ## Design Requirements TODO: Fill out or delete [If applicable, please provide a link to the design specifications for this feature/enhancement.] ## Impact Assessment TODO: Fill out or delete [Please describe the impact this feature/enhancement will have on the user experience and/or the product as a whole.] ## User Story TODO: Fill out or delete [Provide a user story to illustrate the use case for this feature/enhancement. Include examples to help communicate the intended functionality.] <!-- Replace with other type, e.g. bug or maintenance, if appropriate --> <!-- Replace with other subtype if appropriate --> <!-- By default, all issues start in the unprioritized status. See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/development/dev/create/ide/#-remote-development-planning-process --> <!-- For simplicity and to avoid triage bot warnings about missing workflow labels, we will default to issues starting at the refinement phase -->