<!--IssueSummary start--> <details> <summary> Everyone can contribute. [Help move this issue forward](https://handbook.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/developer-relations/contributor-success/community-contributors-workflows/#contributor-links) while earning points, leveling up and collecting rewards. </summary> - [Close this issue](https://contributors.gitlab.com/manage-issue?action=close&projectId=278964&issueIid=426895) </details> <!--IssueSummary end--> <!-- The first section "Release notes" is required if you want to have your release post blog MR auto generated. Currently in BETA, details on the **release post item generator** can be found in the handbook: https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/blog/release-posts/#release-post-item-generator and this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rfn9ebgTwKg. The next four sections: "Problem to solve", "Intended users", "User experience goal", and "Proposal", are strongly recommended in your first draft, while the rest of the sections can be filled out during the problem validation or breakdown phase. However, keep in mind that providing complete and relevant information early helps our product team validate the problem and start working on a solution. --> ### Release notes Add in a filter to only display MR's in the list view with unresolved comments so that a user can see MR's which actively need work done. <!-- What is the problem and solution you're proposing? This content sets the overall vision for the feature and serves as the release notes that will populate in various places, including the [release post blog](https://about.gitlab.com/releases/categories/releases/) and [Gitlab project releases](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/releases). " --> ### Problem to solve As a developer, I want to be able to filter down to MR's which only have unresolved comments so that I can easily identify which MR's actively need work. <!-- What problem do we solve? Try to define the who/what/why of the opportunity as a user story. For example, "As a (who), I want (what), so I can (why/value)." --> ### Intended users Developers <!-- Who will use this feature? If known, include any of the following: types of users (e.g. Developer), personas, or specific company roles (e.g. Release Manager). It's okay to write "Unknown" and fill this field in later. Personas are described at https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/personas/ * [Parker (Product Manager)](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/personas/#parker-product-manager) * [Delaney (Development Team Lead)](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/personas/#delaney-development-team-lead) * [Presley (Product Designer)](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/personas/#presley-product-designer) * [Sasha (Software Developer)](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/personas/#sasha-software-developer) * [Priyanka (Platform Engineer)](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/personas/#priyanka-platform-engineer) * [Sidney (Systems Administrator)](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/personas/#sidney-systems-administrator) * [Rachel (Release Manager)](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/personas/#rachel-release-manager) * [Simone (Software Engineer in Test)](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/personas/#simone-software-engineer-in-test) * [Allison (Application Ops)](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/personas/#allison-application-ops) * [Ingrid (Infrastructure Operator)](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/personas/#ingrid-infrastructure-operator) * [Dakota (Application Development Director)](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/personas/#dakota-application-development-director) * [Dana (Data Analyst)](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/personas/#dana-data-analyst) * [Eddie (Content Editor)](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/personas/#eddie-content-editor) * [Amy (Application Security Engineer)](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/personas/#amy-application-security-engineer) * [Isaac (Infrastructure Engineer)](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/personas/#isaac-infrastructure-security-engineer) * [Alex (Security Operations Engineer)](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/personas/#alex-security-operations-engineer) * [Cameron (Compliance Manager)](https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/personas/#cameron-compliance-manager) --> ### User experience goal With a significant amount of MR's, it is increasibly harder to identify which ones actively need work done on them. This feature resolves this problem by allowing a user to search for MR's which have unresolved comments that need addressing. <!-- What is the single user experience workflow this problem addresses? For example, "The user should be able to use the UI/API/.gitlab-ci.yml with GitLab to <perform a specific task>" https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/ux/ux-research-training/user-story-mapping/ --> ### Proposal My main suggestion would be to add in a filter to the search bar so a user can type something like: `unresolved-comments {OP} {int}` where OP can be `greater than`, `less than` or `equals`. However if you want to make the change more generalised, and not just focused on unresolved comments, you could also add ones for `resolved-comments` or just `comments` in general. Though with the last one, I don't see much of a purpose to it if you have a filter for both `resolved` and `unresolved` comments. <!-- How are we going to solve the problem? Try to include the user journey! https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/journeys/#user-journey --> ### Further details Currently, on the MR list view, it shows you all the comments in an MR:  There is currently no way to see whether those three comments are resolved or not. So I have to click on the MR then view the top right to see if the comments are resolved.  It is tedious to do so, especially if you have a significant amount of MR's open. There was an issue created over six years ago asking for this, but it was on the read-only repo [here](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-foss/-/issues/36612). Not sure if this is in the wrong place, I wanted to bump the issue but am unable due to the repo being read only. Also apologies if this is all incorrect, I was just following the guide [here](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/blob/master/doc/development/contributing/issue_workflow.md#feature-proposals). <!-- Include use cases, benefits, goals, or any other details that will help us understand the problem better. --> ### Permissions and Security <!-- What permissions are required to perform the described actions? Are they consistent with the existing permissions as documented for users, groups, and projects as appropriate? Is the proposed behavior consistent between the UI, API, and other access methods (e.g. email replies)? Consider adding checkboxes and expectations of users with certain levels of membership https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/permissions.html * [ ] Add expected impact to members with no access (0) * [x] Add expected impact to Guest (10) members * [x] Add expected impact to Reporter (20) members * [x] Add expected impact to Developer (30) members * [x] Add expected impact to Maintainer (40) members * [x] Add expected impact to Owner (50) members Please consider performing a threat model for the code changes that are introduced as part of this feature. To get started, refer to our Threat Modeling handbook page https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/security/threat_modeling/#threat-modeling. Don't hesitate to reach out to the Application Security Team (`@gitlab-com/gl-security/appsec`) to discuss any security concerns. --> * [x] Add expected impact to Guest (10) members * [x] Add expected impact to Reporter (20) members * [x] Add expected impact to Developer (30) members * [x] Add expected impact to Maintainer (40) members * [x] Add expected impact to Owner (50) members ### Documentation <!-- See the Feature Change Documentation Workflow https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/documentation/workflow.html#for-a-product-change * Add all known Documentation Requirements in this section. See https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/documentation/workflow.html * If this feature requires changing permissions, update the permissions document. See https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/permissions.html --> ### Availability & Testing <!-- This section needs to be retained and filled in during the workflow planning breakdown phase of this feature proposal, if not earlier. What risks does this change pose to our availability? How might it affect the quality of the product? What additional test coverage or changes to tests will be needed? Will it require cross-browser testing? Please list the test areas (unit, integration and end-to-end) that needs to be added or updated to ensure that this feature will work as intended. Please use the list below as guidance. * Unit test changes * Integration test changes * End-to-end test change See the Quality Engineering quad planning and test planning processes and reach out to your counterpart Software Engineer in Test for assistance. Quad Planning: https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/quality/quality-engineering/quad-planning Test Planning: https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/quality/quality-engineering/test-engineering/#test-planning --> ### Available Tier <!-- This section should be used for setting the appropriate tier that this feature will belong to. Pricing can be found here: https://about.gitlab.com/pricing/ * Free * Premium/Silver * Ultimate/Gold --> ### Feature Usage Metrics <!-- How are you going to track usage of this feature? Think about user behavior and their interaction with the product. What indicates someone is getting value from it? Create tracking issue using the Snowplow event tracking template. See https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/.gitlab/issue_templates/Snowplow%20event%20tracking.md --> ### What does success look like, and how can we measure that? <!-- Define both the success metrics and acceptance criteria. Note that success metrics indicate the desired business outcomes, while acceptance criteria indicate when the solution is working correctly. If there is no way to measure success, link to an issue that will implement a way to measure this. Create tracking issue using the Snowplow event tracking template. See https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/.gitlab/issue_templates/Snowplow%20event%20tracking.md --> ### What is the type of buyer? <!-- What is the buyer persona for this feature? See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/personas/buyer-persona/ In which enterprise tier should this feature go? See https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/pricing/#three-tiers --> ### Is this a cross-stage feature? <!-- Communicate if this change will affect multiple Stage Groups or product areas. We recommend always start with the assumption that a feature request will have an impact into another Group. Loop in the most relevant PM and Product Designer from that Group to provide strategic support to help align the Group's broader plan and vision, as well as to avoid UX and technical debt. https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/#cross-stage-features --> ### What is the competitive advantage or differentiation for this feature? ### Links / references <!-- Label reminders - you should have one of each of the following labels. Use the following resources to find the appropriate labels: - Use only one tier label choosing the lowest tier this is intended for - https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/labels - https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/categories/features/ -->