Follow-up from "rails integration branch for "Remote Development Integration Branches""
The following discussion from !105783 should be addressed: - [ ] @splattael started a [discussion](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/105783#note_1378414207): (+2 comments) > **Suggestion** (non-blocking) Thoughts on `include RemoteDevelopment::Workspaces::States` instead? :thinking: > > This would simplify the setup and make `object` unnecessary.
issue