### Problem to solve Sometimes a template contains tasks which are not relevant to the issue/MR. Rather than just checking them off or deleting them, I think it's better to indicate that they're not necessary. I personally adapted the `- [-]` syntax for this which I've seen others do. Unfortunately these are rendered as-is and look a bit out of place:  ### Intended users <!-- Who will use this feature? If known, include any of the following: types of users (e.g. Developer), personas, or specific company roles (e.g. Release Manager). It's okay to write "Unknown" and fill this field in later. Personas can be found at https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/product-marketing/roles-personas/ --> ### Further details <!-- Include use cases, benefits, and/or goals (contributes to our vision?) --> ### Proposal Standardize on a syntax, and render these as disabled checkboxes. Disabled tasks should not be included in the count of "tasks completed". <!-- How are we going to solve the problem? Try to include the user journey! https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/journeys/#user-journey --> ### Permissions and Security <!-- What permissions are required to perform the described actions? Are they consistent with the existing permissions as documented for users, groups, and projects as appropriate? Is the proposed behavior consistent between the UI, API, and other access methods (e.g. email replies)? --> ### Documentation <!-- See the Feature Change Documentation Workflow https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/documentation/feature-change-workflow.html Add all known Documentation Requirements here, per https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/documentation/feature-change-workflow.html#documentation-requirements --> The chosen syntax should be documented at https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/markdown.html#task-lists. ### Testing <!-- What risks does this change pose? How might it affect the quality of the product? What additional test coverage or changes to tests will be needed? Will it require cross-browser testing? See the test engineering process for further guidelines: https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/quality/guidelines/test-engineering/ --> ### What does success look like, and how can we measure that? <!-- Define both the success metrics and acceptance criteria. Note that success metrics indicate the desired business outcomes, while acceptance criteria indicate when the solution is working correctly. If there is no way to measure success, link to an issue that will implement a way to measure this. --> ### Links / references