Follow-up from "Make `workflow:rules` work well with Merge Requests"
> From @grzesiek: The amount of duplication between an `entry/job` and `entry/bridge` looks like something we should fix as a technical debt too. (out of scope here, of course). > From @ayufan: Yes, i agree. It is problematic to introduce concern today as a lot of configurable/validations works only in context of a given class, so we cannot easily deduplicate it yet. We should maintain a single implementation across `Config::Bridge` and `Config::Job`, similar to how we do it with `Ci::Processables`.
issue