Update Vue to ^2.7.10
This MR contains the following updates:
Package | Type | Update | Change |
---|---|---|---|
vue | dependencies | patch | ^2.7.9 -> ^2.7.10 |
vue-template-compiler | dependencies | patch | ^2.7.9 -> ^2.7.10 |
MR created with the help of gitlab-org/frontend/renovate-gitlab-bot
Release Notes
Configuration
-
If you want to rebase/retry this MR, click this checkbox.
This MR has been generated by Renovate Bot.
Merge request reports
Activity
Renovate Comment
This Merge Request has been created with the help of renovate-gitlab-bot project.
What are the next steps?
If you have been assigned as a reviewer to this Merge Request, please review this Merge Request with the same scrutiny as any community contribution:
-
Ensure that the dependencies updated meet our standards:
- Security: Dependencies do not contain malicious code
- Performance: Dependencies do not bloat the application code or prolong CI times unnecessarily
- Stability: Pipelines are passing
-
If tests are passing and you've reviewed the updated dependencies, execute pipelines in the context of the main project
This MR is created from a fork, therefore not all jobs (e.g. Danger) might have been executed. Instead of hitting MWPS right away, you might want to wait until the pipeline you've just triggered finished.
Note: This might not be available in projects, in that case merging right away is an option
-
Merge away!
Troubleshooting
We have assembled some FAQs to help reviewers of these kind of merge requests.
Improve this message – The JSON comment below is for automation purposes.
{"labels":["frontend","maintenance::dependency","type::maintenance","automation:bot-authored"],"assignees":["gitlab-dependency-update-bot"],"reviewers":["@leipert"]}
-
assigned to @gitlab-dependency-update-bot
mentioned in issue #365044
requested review from @leipert
- Resolved by Natalia Tepluhina
@ntepluhina Before the update is after the update. Or the other way around
requested review from @ntepluhina and removed review request for @leipert
@ntepluhina
, thanks for approving this merge request.This is the first time the merge request is approved. To ensure full test coverage, a new pipeline has been started.
For more info, please refer to the following links:
Suggested Reviewers (beta)
The individuals below may be good candidates to participate in the review based on various factors.
You can use slash commands in comments to quickly assign
/assign_reviewer @user1
.Suggested Reviewers @rspeicher
,@mayra-cabrera
,@tkuah
,@filipa
,@marcel.amirault
If you do not believe these suggestions are useful, please apply the label Bad Suggested Reviewer. You can also provide feedback for this feature on this issue:
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/357923
.Automatically generated by Suggested Reviewers Bot - an experimental ML-based recommendation engine created by ~"group::applied ml".
Merge request already approved.
Adding automation:bot-no-updates in order to prevent renovate from updating the MR.
If you want the MR to be updated again, please remove the label and check the "rebase checkbox" in the description.
added automation:bot-no-updates label
1 Warning This merge request does not refer to an existing milestone. 1 Message CHANGELOG missing: If you want to create a changelog entry for GitLab FOSS, add the
Changelog
trailer to the commit message you want to add to the changelog.If you want to create a changelog entry for GitLab EE, also add the
EE: true
trailer to your commit message.If this merge request doesn't need a CHANGELOG entry, feel free to ignore this message.
Reviewer roulette
Changes that require review have been detected!
Please refer to the table below for assigning reviewers and maintainers suggested by Danger in the specified category:
Category Reviewer Maintainer frontend Tristan Read ( @tristan.read
) (UTC+12)Jose Ivan Vargas ( @jivanvl
) (UTC-5)To spread load more evenly across eligible reviewers, Danger has picked a candidate for each review slot, based on their timezone. Feel free to override these selections if you think someone else would be better-suited or use the GitLab Review Workload Dashboard to find other available reviewers.
To read more on how to use the reviewer roulette, please take a look at the Engineering workflow and code review guidelines. Please consider assigning a reviewer or maintainer who is a domain expert in the area of the merge request.
Once you've decided who will review this merge request, assign them as a reviewer! Danger does not automatically notify them for you.
If needed, you can retry the
danger-review
job that generated this comment.Generated by
DangerBundle size analysis [beta]
This compares changes in bundle size for entry points between the commits eff9b033 and d79e0f94
Special assetsEntrypoint / Name Size before Size after Diff Diff in percent average 3.59 MB 3.6 MB - 0.0 % mainChunk 1.98 MB 1.98 MB - 0.0 %
Note: We do not have exact data for eff9b033. So we have used data from: 569e2476.
The intended commit has no webpack pipeline, so we chose the last commit with one before it.Please look at the full report for more details
Read more about how this report works.
Generated by
Dangerchanged milestone to %15.4
mentioned in commit 4ed87e24
added workflowstaging-canary label
added workflowcanary label and removed workflowstaging-canary label
added workflowstaging label and removed workflowcanary label
added workflowproduction label and removed workflowstaging label
added workflowpost-deploy-db-staging label and removed workflowproduction label
added workflowpost-deploy-db-production label and removed workflowpost-deploy-db-staging label
added releasedcandidate label
added releasedpublished label and removed releasedcandidate label