Update docker example for DAST

What does this MR do and why?

I am pretty sure the docker example needs the services to be under the dast stage otherwise the pipeline will try to boot the service when the image hasn't even been built

Screenshots or screen recordings

These are strongly recommended to assist reviewers and reduce the time to merge your change.

How to set up and validate locally

Numbered steps to set up and validate the change are strongly suggested.

MR acceptance checklist

This checklist encourages us to confirm any changes have been analyzed to reduce risks in quality, performance, reliability, security, and maintainability.

• I have evaluated the MR acceptance checklist for this MR.

Hey @zanechua!

Thank you for your contribution to GitLab. Please refer to the contribution flow documentation for a quick overview of the process, and the merge request (MR) guidelines for the detailed process.

When you're ready for a first review, post @gitlab-bot ready. If you know a relevant reviewer(s) (for example, someone that was involved in a related issue), you can also assign them directly with @gitlab-bot ready @user1 @user2.

At any time, if you need help moving the MR forward, feel free to post @gitlab-bot help. Read more on how to get help.

To enable automated checks on your MR, please configure Danger for your fork.

You can comment @gitlab-bot label <label1> <label2> to add labels to your MR. Please see the list of allowed labels in the label command documentation.

This message was generated automatically. You're welcome to improve it.

added Community contribution workflowin dev labels

assigned to @zanechua

changed title from Update docker example to Update docker example for DAST

changed the description

@gitlab-bot ready

added workflowready for review label and removed workflowin dev label

Hi @rdickenson! Please review this documentation merge request.

This message was generated automatically. You're welcome to improve it.

added documentation twtriaged labels

@mayra-cabrera, this Community contribution is ready for review.

• Do you have capacity and domain expertise to review this? We are mindful of your time, so if you are not able to take this on, please re-assign to one or more other reviewers.
• Add the workflowin dev label if the merge request needs action from the author.

This message was generated automatically. You're welcome to improve it.

requested review from @mayra-cabrera

added 1st contribution label

mentioned in issue gitlab-org/quality/triage-reports#8336 (closed)

added devopssecure groupdynamic analysis labels

Pipeline without specifying the dast: job results in failure:

https://gitlab.com/aelham/react-frontend/-/pipelines/586457907

As opposed to:

https://gitlab.com/aelham/react-frontend/-/pipelines/586470782

requested review from @craigmsmith and removed review request for @mayra-cabrera

added sectionsec label

requested review from @idawson

mentioned in issue gitlab-org/quality/triage-reports#8347 (closed)

approved this merge request

requested review from @rdickenson

added typemaintenance label

added Technical Writing label

added docsimprovement label

approved this merge request

resolved all threads

Suggested Reviewers (beta)

The individuals below may be good candidates to participate in the review based on various factors.

You can use slash commands in comments to quickly assign /assign_reviewer @user1.

Suggested Reviewers
@rspeicher, @aqualls, @marin, @marcel.amirault, @kushalpandya

If you do not believe these suggestions are useful, please apply the label Bad Suggested Reviewer. You can also provide feedback for this feature on this issue: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/357923.

Automatically generated by Suggested Reviewers Bot - an experimental ML-based recommendation engine created by ~"group::applied ml".

	1 Warning
	This merge request does not refer to an existing milestone.

	1 Message
	This merge request adds or changes documentation files. A review from the Technical Writing team before you merge is recommended. Reviews can happen after you merge.

Documentation review

The following files require a review from a technical writer:

• doc/user/application_security/dast/index.md

The review does not need to block merging this merge request. See the:

• Metadata for the *.md files that you've changed. The first few lines of each *.md file identify the stage and group most closely associated with your docs change.
• The Technical Writer assigned for that stage and group.
• Documentation workflows for information on when to assign a merge request for review.

If needed, you can retry the danger-review job that generated this comment.

Generated by Danger

merged

@zanechua, how was your code review experience with this merge request? Please tell us how we can continue to iterate and improve:

1. Leave a or a on this comment to describe your experience.
2. Create a new comment starting with @gitlab-bot feedback below, and leave any additional feedback you have for us in the comment.

Have five minutes? Take our survey to give us even more feedback on how GitLab can improve the contributor experience.

Thanks for your help!

This message was generated automatically. You're welcome to improve it.

mentioned in commit d2c11b9b

changed milestone to %15.2

added workflowstaging-canary label and removed workflowready for review label

added workflowcanary label and removed workflowstaging-canary label

added workflowstaging label and removed workflowcanary label

added workflowproduction label and removed workflowstaging label

added workflowpost-deploy-db-staging label and removed workflowproduction label

added workflowpost-deploy-db-production label and removed workflowpost-deploy-db-staging label

added releasedcandidate label

added releasedpublished label and removed releasedcandidate label