Update doc/administration/reference_architectures/2k_users.md

requested review from @axil

Suggested Reviewers (beta)

The individuals below may be good candidates to participate in the review based on various factors.

You can use slash commands in comments to quickly assign /assign_reviewer @user1.

Suggested Reviewers
`@marcel.amirault`, `@aqualls`, `@gitlab-bot`, `@rdickenson`, `@cnorris`

If you do not believe these suggestions are useful, please apply the label Bad Suggested Reviewer. You can also provide feedback for this feature on this issue: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/357923.

Automatically generated by Suggested Reviewers Bot - an experimental ML-based recommendation engine created by ~"group::applied ml".

added documentation label

	5 Warnings
	The merge request title must contain at least 3 words. For more information, take a look at our Commit message guidelines.
	8b77dd73: The commit subject must contain at least 3 words. For more information, take a look at our Commit message guidelines.
	1627df5d: The commit subject must contain at least 3 words. For more information, take a look at our Commit message guidelines.
	40491e28: The commit subject must contain at least 3 words. For more information, take a look at our Commit message guidelines.
	4cf91faa: The commit subject must contain at least 3 words. For more information, take a look at our Commit message guidelines.

	1 Message
	This merge request adds or changes documentation files. A review from the Technical Writing team before you merge is recommended. Reviews can happen after you merge.

Documentation review

The following files require a review from a technical writer:

doc/administration/reference_architectures/2k_users.md

The review does not need to block merging this merge request. See the:

Metadata for the *.md files that you've changed. The first few lines of each *.md file identify the stage and group most closely associated with your docs change.
The Technical Writer assigned for that stage and group.
Documentation workflows for information on when to assign a merge request for review.

If needed, you can retry the danger-review job that generated this comment.

Generated by Danger

@bocarbonell - please add typebug typefeature, typemaintenance or a subtype label to this merge request.

typebug: Defects in shipped code and fixes for those defects. This includes all the bug types (availability, performance, security vulnerability, mobile, etc.)
typefeature: Effort to deliver new features, feature changes & improvements. This includes all changes as part of new product requirements like application limits.
typemaintenance: Up-keeping efforts & catch-up corrective improvements that are not Features nor Bugs. This includes restructuring for long-term maintainability, stability, reducing technical debt, improving the contributor experience, or upgrading dependencies.

See the handbook for more guidance on classifying.

This message was created with automation and Engineering Productivity is looking for feedback in this issue: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/quality/engineering-productivity/team/-/issues/43