Update DS_INCLUDE_DEV_DEPENDENCIES description
What does this MR do?
This MR documents support for optionally including development dependencies when scanning Poetry projects.
Related issues
Author's checklist
-
Optional. Consider taking the GitLab Technical Writing Fundamentals course. -
Follow the: -
If you're adding or changing the main heading of the page (H1), ensure that the product tier badge is added. -
If you are a GitLab team member, request a review based on: - The documentation page's metadata.
- The associated Technical Writer.
If you are a GitLab team member and only adding documentation, do not add any of the following labels:
~"frontend"
~"backend"
~"type::bug"
~"database"
These labels cause the MR to be added to code verification QA issues.
Reviewer's checklist
Documentation-related MRs should be reviewed by a Technical Writer for a non-blocking review, based on Documentation Guidelines and the Style Guide.
-
If the content requires it, ensure the information is reviewed by a subject matter expert. - Technical writer review items:
-
Ensure docs metadata is present and up-to-date. -
Ensure the appropriate labels are added to this MR. -
Ensure a release milestone is set. - If relevant to this MR, ensure content topic type principles are in use, including:
-
The headings should be something you'd do a Google search for. Instead of Default behavior
, say something likeDefault behavior when you close an issue
. -
The headings (other than the page title) should be active. Instead of Configuring GDK
, say something likeConfigure GDK
. -
Any task steps should be written as a numbered list. - If the content still needs to be edited for topic types, you can create a follow-up issue with the docs-technical-debt label.
-
-
-
Review by assigned maintainer, who can always request/require the reviews above. Maintainer's review can occur before or after a technical writer review.
Merge request reports
Activity
changed milestone to %15.2
added docsimprovement documentation typemaintenance labels
assigned to @hacks4oats
Suggested Reviewers (beta)
The individuals below may be good candidates to participate in the review based on various factors.
You can use slash commands in comments to quickly assign
/assign_reviewer @user1
.Suggested Reviewers @rspeicher
,@reprazent
,@aqualls
,@alyubenkov
,@marcel.amirault
If you do not believe these suggestions are useful, please apply the label Bad Suggested Reviewer. You can also provide feedback for this feature on this issue:
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/357923
.Automatically generated by Suggested Reviewers Bot - an experimental ML-based recommendation engine created by ~"group::applied ml".
Edited by GitLab Reviewer-Recommender Bot1 Message This merge request adds or changes documentation files. A review from the Technical Writing team before you merge is recommended. Reviews can happen after you merge. Documentation review
The following files require a review from a technical writer:
doc/user/application_security/dependency_scanning/index.md
The review does not need to block merging this merge request. See the:
-
Metadata for the
*.md
files that you've changed. The first few lines of each*.md
file identify the stage and group most closely associated with your docs change. - The Technical Writer assigned for that stage and group.
- Documentation workflows for information on when to assign a merge request for review.
If needed, you can retry the
danger-review
job that generated this comment.Generated by
Dangerremoved typemaintenance label
added featureaddition label
added typefeature label
@hacks4oats as this MR supports an upcoming feature, I've checked the label. Please, see https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/metrics/#work-type-classification
Edited by Tetiana ChuprynaSetting label(s) Technical Writing based on docsimprovement.
added Technical Writing label
added 2799 commits
-
f0c8c707...15071640 - 2798 commits from branch
master
- 2c058367 - Update DS_INCLUDE_DEV_DEPENDENCIES description
-
f0c8c707...15071640 - 2798 commits from branch
requested review from @rdickenson
added Pick into 15.2 label
removed Pick into 15.2 label
@rdickenson as we're running of time in %15.2 I'll merge this small change as it looks good from an engineering perspective. Please, raise any concerns if we need to follow-up
enabled an automatic merge when the pipeline for 30c2f20d succeeds
mentioned in issue #364584 (closed)
mentioned in commit edec4ea1
added workflowstaging-canary label
added workflowcanary label and removed workflowstaging-canary label
added workflowstaging label and removed workflowcanary label
added workflowproduction label and removed workflowstaging label
added workflowpost-deploy-db-staging label and removed workflowproduction label
added workflowpost-deploy-db-production label and removed workflowpost-deploy-db-staging label
added releasedcandidate label
added releasedpublished label and removed releasedcandidate label