Use UserID for attention GraphQL mutations
What does this MR do and why?
Fixes some GraphQL queries that will become invalid when !83457 (merged) is merged.
This does not change any behavior.
See: #257883 (closed)
MR acceptance checklist
This checklist encourages us to confirm any changes have been analyzed to reduce risks in quality, performance, reliability, security, and maintainability.
-
I have evaluated the MR acceptance checklist for this MR.
Merge request reports
Activity
added GraphQL label
Suggested Reviewers (beta)
This is an experimental ML-based code reviewer recommendation system created by ~"group::applied ml".
The individuals below may be good candidates to participate in the review based on various factors.
After you review all recommendations, please assign reviewers manually, as this is not done automatically.
You can use slash commands in comments to quickly assign
/assign_reviewer @user1
.Reviewers @euko
,@ntepluhina
,@kushalpandya
,@psimyn
,@ekigbo
If you do not believe these recommendations are useful or if you do not want to use any of the suggestions, please apply the label Bad Suggested Reviewer. You can also provide feedback for this feature on this issue:
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/357923
.Automatically generated by Suggested Reviewers Bot
3 Warnings ⚠ Please add a merge request type to this merge request. ⚠ You've made some app changes, but didn't add any tests.
That's OK as long as you're refactoring existing code,
but please consider adding any of the maintenancepipelines, maintenanceworkflow, documentation, QA labels.⚠ This merge request does not refer to an existing milestone. 1 Message 📖 CHANGELOG missing: If you want to create a changelog entry for GitLab FOSS, add the
Changelog
trailer to the commit message you want to add to the changelog.If you want to create a changelog entry for GitLab EE, also add the
EE: true
trailer to your commit message.If this merge request doesn't need a CHANGELOG entry, feel free to ignore this message.
If needed, you can retry the
🔁 danger-review
job that generated this comment.Reviewer roulette
Changes that require review have been detected!
Please refer to the table below for assigning reviewers and maintainers suggested by Danger in the specified category:
Category Reviewer Maintainer frontend Payton Burdette ( @pburdette
) (UTC-4, 5 hours behind@alexkalderimis
)Miguel Rincon ( @mrincon
) (UTC+2, 1 hour ahead of@alexkalderimis
)To spread load more evenly across eligible reviewers, Danger has picked a candidate for each review slot, based on their timezone. Feel free to override these selections if you think someone else would be better-suited or use the GitLab Review Workload Dashboard to find other available reviewers.
To read more on how to use the reviewer roulette, please take a look at the Engineering workflow and code review guidelines. Please consider assigning a reviewer or maintainer who is a domain expert in the area of the merge request.
Once you've decided who will review this merge request, assign them as a reviewer! Danger does not automatically notify them for you.
Generated by
🚫 DangerBundle size analysis [beta]
This compares changes in bundle size for entry points between the commits 3a63cf6f and 1c138ec6
✨ Special assetsEntrypoint / Name Size before Size after Diff Diff in percent average 3.45 MB 3.45 MB - -0.0 % mainChunk 1.93 MB 1.93 MB - 0.0 %
Please look at the full report for more details
Read more about how this report works.
Generated by
🚫 Dangerassigned to @alexkalderimis
- Resolved by Miguel Rincon
Danger chooses you @pburdette! - Could you please give this MR its first frontend review?
requested review from @pburdette
Allure report
allure-report-publisher
generated test report!review-qa-blocking:
❗ test report for 1c138ec6expand test summary
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+ | suites summary | +----------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+--------+ | | passed | failed | skipped | flaky | result | +----------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+--------+ | Create | 23 | 0 | 3 | 13 | ❗ | | Manage | 31 | 0 | 2 | 25 | ❗ | | Verify | 12 | 0 | 1 | 9 | ❗ | | Plan | 41 | 0 | 1 | 21 | ❗ | | Version sanity check | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ➖ | | Protect | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ✅ | | Package | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ➖ | | Configure | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ➖ | +----------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+--------+ | Total | 109 | 0 | 10 | 68 | ❗ | +----------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+--------+
added groupintegrations [DEPRECATED] label
👋 @pburdette
, thanks for approving this merge request.This is the first time the merge request is approved. To ensure full test coverage, a new pipeline has been started.
For more info, please refer to the following links:
removed review request for @pburdette
requested review from @mrincon
enabled an automatic merge when the pipeline for cc23f284 succeeds
changed milestone to %15.0
mentioned in commit 4a81d225
added workflowstaging-canary label
added workflowstaging label and removed workflowstaging-canary label
added workflowproduction label and removed workflowstaging label
added releasedcandidate label
added typemaintenance label
added releasedpublished label and removed releasedcandidate label
added Deliverable label
added groupimport and integrate label and removed groupintegrations [DEPRECATED] label