Resolve "GitLab Migration - migrations with status timeout (3) are not updated in the UI"

What does this MR do and why?

This MR adds handling of timeout status for Gitlab Migration Related to #358153 (closed)

Screenshots or screen recordings

How to set up and validate locally

• Open "New group" -> Import (/groups/new)
• Use https://gitlab.com as source instance and GeK1Nis4j-SY1X4sqE5c as personal access token (this token is from separate user on GitLab instance with 0 real data available, so we do not expose any security risks here)
• Initiate new import and wait it to become "complete"
• Open bundle exec rails console
• Run

m = BulkImport.last
m.status = 3
m.save

(3 is timeout)

• Refresh page, observe timeout status

MR acceptance checklist

This checklist encourages us to confirm any changes have been analyzed to reduce risks in quality, performance, reliability, security, and maintainability.

• I have evaluated the MR acceptance checklist for this MR.

changed milestone to %15.0

added Category:Importers Importer:Direct Transfer Next Up auto updated devopsmanage frontend quad-planningcomplete-no-action sectiondev workflowin dev + 1 deleted label

assigned to @xanf

marked this merge request as ready

changed the description

added 1 commit

• 87ac532f - Handle timeout status in GitLab migration

Compare with previous version

Suggested Reviewers (beta)

This is an experimental ML-based code reviewer recommendation system created by ~"group::applied ml".

The individuals below may be good candidates to participate in the review based on various factors.

After you review all recommendations, please assign reviewers manually, as this is not done automatically.

You can use slash commands in comments to quickly assign /assign_reviewer @user1.

Reviewers
@iamphill, @jerasmus, @ntepluhina, @xanf, @ekigbo

If you do not believe these recommendations are useful or if you do not want to use any of the suggestions, please apply the label Bad Suggested Reviewer. You can also provide feedback for this feature on this issue: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/357923.

Automatically generated by Suggested Reviewers Bot

added featureaddition typefeature labels

Reviewer roulette

Changes that require review have been detected!

Please refer to the table below for assigning reviewers and maintainers suggested by Danger in the specified category:

Category	Reviewer	Maintainer
frontend	Nicolas Dular (@nicolasdular) (UTC+2, 1 hour behind @xanf)	Phil Hughes (@iamphill) (UTC+1, 2 hours behind @xanf)

To spread load more evenly across eligible reviewers, Danger has picked a candidate for each review slot, based on their timezone. Feel free to override these selections if you think someone else would be better-suited or use the GitLab Review Workload Dashboard to find other available reviewers.

To read more on how to use the reviewer roulette, please take a look at the Engineering workflow and code review guidelines. Please consider assigning a reviewer or maintainer who is a domain expert in the area of the merge request.

Once you've decided who will review this merge request, assign them as a reviewer! Danger does not automatically notify them for you.

Generated by Danger

Bundle size analysis [beta]

This compares changes in bundle size for entry points between the commits 4bd23f6b and 87ac532f

Special assets

Entrypoint / Name	Size before	Size after	Diff	Diff in percent
mainChunk	1.93 MB	1.93 MB	-4.13 KB	-0.2 %
average	3.45 MB	3.45 MB	+1.31 KB	0.0 %

Significant Growth: 1

Expand

Entrypoint / Name	Size before	Size after	Diff	Diff in percent
pages.projects.threat_monitoring.show	1.66 MB	1.75 MB	+89.49 KB	5.3 %

New entry points: 3

Expand

Entrypoint / Name	Size before	Size after	Diff	Diff in percent
pages.projects.serverless	0 Bytes	4.51 MB	+4.51 MB	100.0 %
pages.projects.wikis.edit	0 Bytes	1.36 MB	+1.36 MB	100.0 %
pages.groups.wikis.edit	0 Bytes	1.26 MB	+1.26 MB	100.0 %

Significant Reduction: 1

Expand

Entrypoint / Name	Size before	Size after	Diff	Diff in percent
pages.projects.quality.test_cases.new	1.69 MB	1.65 MB	-40.63 KB	-2.3 %

---

Your MR has at least one entrypoint growing significantly (more > 1 KB or 2%). If you write new or extend existing features, this is expected and there is nothing to worry about.

Please consider pinging someone from the FE Foundations (@dmishunov, @justin_ho, @mikegreiling or @nmezzopera) for review, if you are unsure about the size increase.

Note: We do not have exact data for 4bd23f6b. So we have used data from: 990f51c1.
The target commit was too new, so we used the latest commit from master we have info on.
It might help to rerun the bundle-size-review job
This might mean that you have a few false positives in this report. If something unrelated to your code changes is reported, you can check this comparison in order to see if they caused this change.

Please look at the full report for more details

---

Read more about how this report works.

Generated by Danger

@thomasrandolph could you please review this one?

added 1 deleted label and removed featureaddition label

requested review from @thomasrandolph

Allure report

allure-report-publisher generated test report!

review-qa-blocking: test report for 87ac532f

expand test summary

+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                          suites summary                           |
+----------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+--------+
|                      | passed | failed | skipped | flaky | result |
+----------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+--------+
| Verify               | 12     | 0      | 1       | 8     | ❗     |
| Version sanity check | 0      | 0      | 1       | 0     | ➖     |
| Create               | 24     | 0      | 2       | 12    | ❗     |
| Manage               | 31     | 0      | 2       | 22    | ❗     |
| Plan                 | 41     | 0      | 1       | 8     | ❗     |
| Package              | 0      | 0      | 1       | 0     | ➖     |
| Configure            | 0      | 0      | 1       | 0     | ➖     |
| Protect              | 2      | 0      | 0       | 0     | ✅     |
+----------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+--------+
| Total                | 110    | 0      | 9       | 50    | ❗     |
+----------------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+--------+

approved this merge request

requested review from @ohoral and removed review request for @thomasrandolph

@thomasrandolph, thanks for approving this merge request.

This is the first time the merge request is approved. To ensure full test coverage, a new pipeline has been started.

For more info, please refer to the following links:

• rspec minimal jobs
• jest minimal jobs
• merging a merge request.

resolved all threads

approved this merge request

enabled an automatic merge when the pipeline for 24dbfc4a succeeds

merged

mentioned in commit 290f9fe5

added workflowstaging-canary label and removed workflowin dev label

added workflowcanary label and removed workflowstaging-canary label

added workflowstaging label and removed workflowcanary label

added workflowproduction label and removed workflowstaging label

added releasedcandidate label

mentioned in merge request kubitus-project/kubitus-installer!1040 (merged)

added releasedpublished label and removed releasedcandidate label

added groupimport and integrate label and removed 1 deleted label