Apply styling change requests in milestone search ready for dark mode

What does this MR do and why?

This MR contains 3 changes (as requested in this figma doc https://www.figma.com/design/7MczJosYzQM3PbuqOpr7WS/Dark-mode-%3E-Global-Search-Evaluation?node-id=6066-494&m=dev):

• Replaces gl-badge use with small subtle text to be in line with rest of page styling
• Makes milestone title styled as a link
• Removes the bottom margin from the last <p> tag in a milestone description (this is converted from markdown, only removing the last <p> so that if there are others they retain their margin. More information on how this works can be found in the MR that introduces this change: !56256 (diffs))

References

Please include cross links to any resources that are relevant to this MR. This will give reviewers and future readers helpful context to give an efficient review of the changes introduced.

MR acceptance checklist

Please evaluate this MR against the MR acceptance checklist. It helps you analyze changes to reduce risks in quality, performance, reliability, security, and maintainability.

Screenshots or screen recordings

Screenshots are required for UI changes, and strongly recommended for all other merge requests.

Before	After

How to set up and validate locally

Numbered steps to set up and validate the change are strongly suggested.

Related to #519779 (closed)

added dark mode devopsfoundations groupglobal search mainentanceusability priority2 sectioncore platform typemaintenance workflowstart labels

assigned to @jrushford

changed the description

changed title from Use small subtle text instead of gl-badge in milestone search results to Apply styling change requests in milestone search ready for dark mode

added pipelinetier-1 label

added backend frontend labels

	2 Warnings
	The master pipeline status page reported failures in setup-test-env If these jobs fail in your merge request with the same errors, then they are not caused by your changes. Please check for any on-going incidents in the incident issue tracker or in the #master-broken Slack channel.
	You've made some app changes, but didn't add any tests. That's OK as long as you're refactoring existing code, but please consider adding any of the maintenancepipelines, maintenancerefactor, maintenanceworkflow, maintenanceperformance, documentation, QA labels.

	1 Message
	CHANGELOG missing: If this merge request needs a changelog entry, add the Changelog trailer to the commit message you want to add to the changelog. If this merge request doesn't need a CHANGELOG entry, feel free to ignore this message.

Reviewer roulette

Category	Reviewer	Maintainer
backend	@arpitgogia (UTC+5.5, 4.5 hours ahead of author)	@hmehra (UTC+11, 10 hours ahead of author)
frontend	@dzubova (UTC+1, same timezone as author)	@apennells (UTC-5, 6 hours behind author)

Please refer to documentation page for guidance on how you can benefit from the Reviewer Roulette, or use the GitLab Review Workload Dashboard to find other available reviewers.

If needed, you can retry the danger-review job that generated this comment.

Generated by Danger

Hey @kpalchyk would you mind please reviewing this MR? skipping intila due to simplicity

requested review from @kpalchyk

approved this merge request

added pipeline:mr-approved label

added pipelinetier-3 pipeline:run-e2e-omnibus-once labels and removed pipelinetier-1 label

Before you set this MR to auto-merge

This merge request will progress on pipeline tiers until it reaches the last tier: pipelinetier-3. We will trigger a new pipeline for each transition to a higher tier.

Before you set this MR to auto-merge, please check the following:

• You are the last maintainer of this merge request
• The latest pipeline for this merge request is pipelinetier-3 (You can find which tier it is in the pipeline name)
• This pipeline is recent enough (created in the last 8 hours)

If all the criteria above apply, please set auto-merge for this merge request.

See pipeline tiers and merging a merge request for more details.

enabled automatic add to merge train when checks pass

changed milestone to %17.10

removed backend label

Bundle size analysis [beta]

This compares changes in bundle size for entry points between the commits 9d994219 and 90033f45

Special assets

Entrypoint / Name	Size before	Size after	Diff	Diff in percent
average	4.88 MB	4.88 MB	-	0.0 %
mainChunk	3.78 MB	3.78 MB	-	0.0 %

---

Note: We do not have exact data for 9d994219. So we have used data from: f05d8220.
The intended commit has no webpack pipeline, so we chose the last commit with one before it.

Please look at the full report for more details

---

Read more about how this report works.

Generated by Danger

E2E Test Result Summary

allure-report-publisher generated test report!

e2e-test-on-cng: test report for 90033f45

expand test summary

+------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                          suites summary                          |
+-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
|             | passed | failed | skipped | flaky | total | result |
+-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
| Govern      | 84     | 0      | 10      | 0     | 94    | ✅     |
| Create      | 140    | 0      | 22      | 0     | 162   | ✅     |
| Plan        | 86     | 0      | 8       | 0     | 94    | ✅     |
| Data Stores | 33     | 0      | 10      | 0     | 43    | ✅     |
| Configure   | 0      | 0      | 3       | 0     | 3     | ➖     |
| Package     | 29     | 0      | 15      | 0     | 44    | ✅     |
| Ai-powered  | 0      | 0      | 2       | 0     | 2     | ➖     |
| Verify      | 52     | 0      | 20      | 0     | 72    | ✅     |
| Fulfillment | 2      | 0      | 7       | 0     | 9     | ✅     |
| Secure      | 3      | 0      | 5       | 0     | 8     | ✅     |
| Release     | 5      | 0      | 1       | 0     | 6     | ✅     |
| Manage      | 1      | 0      | 9       | 0     | 10    | ✅     |
| Monitor     | 8      | 0      | 12      | 0     | 20    | ✅     |
| Growth      | 0      | 0      | 2       | 0     | 2     | ➖     |
| Analytics   | 2      | 0      | 0       | 0     | 2     | ✅     |
| ModelOps    | 0      | 0      | 1       | 0     | 1     | ➖     |
+-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
| Total       | 445    | 0      | 127     | 0     | 572   | ✅     |
+-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+

e2e-test-on-gdk: test report for 90033f45

expand test summary

+------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                          suites summary                          |
+-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
|             | passed | failed | skipped | flaky | total | result |
+-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
| Create      | 135    | 0      | 23      | 0     | 158   | ✅     |
| Fulfillment | 2      | 0      | 7       | 0     | 9     | ✅     |
| Package     | 24     | 0      | 14      | 0     | 38    | ✅     |
| Govern      | 79     | 0      | 13      | 0     | 92    | ✅     |
| Verify      | 51     | 0      | 21      | 0     | 72    | ✅     |
| Plan        | 82     | 0      | 8       | 0     | 90    | ✅     |
| Data Stores | 33     | 0      | 10      | 0     | 43    | ✅     |
| Monitor     | 8      | 0      | 12      | 0     | 20    | ✅     |
| ModelOps    | 0      | 0      | 1       | 0     | 1     | ➖     |
| Growth      | 0      | 0      | 2       | 0     | 2     | ➖     |
| Secure      | 5      | 0      | 3       | 0     | 8     | ✅     |
| Manage      | 1      | 0      | 9       | 0     | 10    | ✅     |
| Configure   | 0      | 0      | 3       | 0     | 3     | ➖     |
| Release     | 5      | 0      | 1       | 0     | 6     | ✅     |
| Analytics   | 2      | 0      | 0       | 0     | 2     | ✅     |
| Ai-powered  | 0      | 0      | 2       | 0     | 2     | ➖     |
+-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
| Total       | 427    | 0      | 129     | 0     | 556   | ✅     |
+-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+

resolved all threads

added backend label

started a merge train

merged

mentioned in commit d0f2c0de

mentioned in issue #519779 (closed)

added workflowstaging-canary label and removed workflowstart label

added workflowcanary label and removed workflowstaging-canary label

added workflowstaging label and removed workflowcanary label

added workflowproduction label and removed workflowstaging label

added workflowpost-deploy-db-staging label and removed workflowproduction label