Adjust labels and docs to remove beta for self-hosted models

What does this MR do and why?

• Adjust labels and docs to remove beta for self-hosted models

Related to: #520666 (closed)

changed milestone to %17.10

added groupcustom models maintenancerefactor typemaintenance labels

assigned to @mhamda

added pipelinetier-1 label

added devopsai-powered sectiondata-science labels

added documentation frontend labels

	1 Message
	This merge request adds or changes documentation files and requires Technical Writing review. The review should happen before merge, but can be post-merge if the merge request is time sensitive.

Documentation review

The following files require a review from a technical writer:

• doc/administration/gitlab_duo_self_hosted/configure_duo_features.md (Link to current live version)

The review does not need to block merging this merge request. See the:

• Metadata for the *.md files that you've changed. The first few lines of each *.md file identify the stage and group most closely associated with your docs change.
• The Technical Writer assigned for that stage and group.
• Documentation workflows for information on when to assign a merge request for review.

Reviewer roulette

Category	Reviewer	Maintainer
frontend	@davidhampgonsalves (UTC-4, 5 hours behind author)	@cngo (UTC+0, 1 hour behind author)

Please refer to documentation page for guidance on how you can benefit from the Reviewer Roulette, or use the GitLab Review Workload Dashboard to find other available reviewers.

If needed, you can retry the danger-review job that generated this comment.

Generated by Danger

mentioned in issue #520666 (closed)

added 1 commit

• a03fb063 - Adjust Self-hosted models in the Duo chat page

Compare with previous version

@marina.mosti Do you mind reviewing this small change?

requested review from @marina.mosti

approved this merge request

added pipeline:mr-approved label

added pipelinetier-2 label and removed pipelinetier-1 label

Before you set this MR to auto-merge

This merge request will progress on pipeline tiers until it reaches the last tier: pipelinetier-3. We will trigger a new pipeline for each transition to a higher tier.

Before you set this MR to auto-merge, please check the following:

• You are the last maintainer of this merge request
• The latest pipeline for this merge request is pipelinetier-3 (You can find which tier it is in the pipeline name)
• This pipeline is recent enough (created in the last 8 hours)

If all the criteria above apply, please set auto-merge for this merge request.

See pipeline tiers and merging a merge request for more details.

requested review from @cngo

Bundle size analysis [beta]

This compares changes in bundle size for entry points between the commits 7f074d1f and a03fb063

Special assets

Entrypoint / Name	Size before	Size after	Diff	Diff in percent
average	4.88 MB	4.88 MB	-	0.0 %
mainChunk	3.77 MB	3.77 MB	-	0.0 %

---

Note: We do not have exact data for 7f074d1f. So we have used data from: c0251475.
The intended commit has no webpack pipeline, so we chose the last commit with one before it.

Please look at the full report for more details

---

Read more about how this report works.

Generated by Danger

E2E Test Result Summary

allure-report-publisher generated test report!

e2e-test-on-gdk: test report for a03fb063

expand test summary

+------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                          suites summary                          |
+-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
|             | passed | failed | skipped | flaky | total | result |
+-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
| Create      | 135    | 0      | 23      | 0     | 158   | ✅     |
| Verify      | 51     | 0      | 21      | 0     | 72    | ✅     |
| Plan        | 82     | 0      | 8       | 0     | 90    | ✅     |
| Data Stores | 33     | 0      | 10      | 0     | 43    | ✅     |
| Govern      | 79     | 0      | 13      | 0     | 92    | ✅     |
| Configure   | 0      | 0      | 3       | 0     | 3     | ➖     |
| Fulfillment | 2      | 0      | 7       | 0     | 9     | ✅     |
| Analytics   | 2      | 0      | 0       | 0     | 2     | ✅     |
| Package     | 24     | 0      | 14      | 0     | 38    | ✅     |
| Manage      | 1      | 0      | 9       | 0     | 10    | ✅     |
| Release     | 5      | 0      | 1       | 0     | 6     | ✅     |
| Monitor     | 8      | 0      | 12      | 0     | 20    | ✅     |
| Ai-powered  | 0      | 0      | 2       | 0     | 2     | ➖     |
| Secure      | 5      | 0      | 3       | 0     | 8     | ✅     |
| Growth      | 0      | 0      | 2       | 0     | 2     | ➖     |
| ModelOps    | 0      | 0      | 1       | 0     | 1     | ➖     |
+-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
| Total       | 427    | 0      | 129     | 0     | 556   | ✅     |
+-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+

e2e-test-on-cng: test report for a03fb063

expand test summary

+------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                          suites summary                          |
+-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
|             | passed | failed | skipped | flaky | total | result |
+-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
| Plan        | 86     | 0      | 8       | 0     | 94    | ✅     |
| Create      | 140    | 0      | 22      | 0     | 162   | ✅     |
| Govern      | 84     | 0      | 10      | 0     | 94    | ✅     |
| Verify      | 52     | 0      | 20      | 0     | 72    | ✅     |
| ModelOps    | 0      | 0      | 1       | 0     | 1     | ➖     |
| Monitor     | 8      | 0      | 12      | 0     | 20    | ✅     |
| Data Stores | 33     | 0      | 10      | 0     | 43    | ✅     |
| Package     | 29     | 0      | 15      | 0     | 44    | ✅     |
| Manage      | 1      | 0      | 9       | 0     | 10    | ✅     |
| Secure      | 3      | 0      | 5       | 0     | 8     | ✅     |
| Release     | 5      | 0      | 1       | 0     | 6     | ✅     |
| Analytics   | 2      | 0      | 0       | 0     | 2     | ✅     |
| Fulfillment | 2      | 0      | 7       | 0     | 9     | ✅     |
| Configure   | 0      | 0      | 3       | 0     | 3     | ➖     |
| Ai-powered  | 0      | 0      | 2       | 0     | 2     | ➖     |
| Growth      | 0      | 0      | 2       | 0     | 2     | ➖     |
+-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
| Total       | 445    | 0      | 127     | 0     | 572   | ✅     |
+-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+

approved this merge request

added pipelinetier-3 pipeline:run-e2e-omnibus-once labels and removed pipelinetier-2 label

left review comments without approving or requesting changes

resolved all threads

enabled automatic add to merge train when checks pass

started a merge train

merged

mentioned in commit 0ce43dd8

mentioned in merge request !182409 (merged)

added workflowstaging-canary label

added workflowcanary label and removed workflowstaging-canary label

added workflowstaging label and removed workflowcanary label

added workflowproduction label and removed workflowstaging label

Hey @mhamda, I just noticed this change. May I ask why the beta label was removed from this check-box please? I didn't see a linked issue. The original label was correct — this checkbox is for enabling beta models where the Testing Agreement needs to be accepted. However it is not required for self-hosted models GA features (which is everything except for the beta models themselves).

In future, are you able to tag me for any frontend reviews on groupcustom models work please? It was a little confusing to discover this as I thought it was a regression.

changed the description

mentioned in merge request !182688 (merged)

resolved all threads

added workflowpost-deploy-db-staging label and removed workflowproduction label