Update AWS Bedrock documentation with IAM guidelines
What does this MR do and why?
Adds additional context around AWS IAM setup for self-hosted Bedrock models. Also adds a link out to official AWS Bedrock IAM documentation.
References
Please include cross links to any resources that are relevant to this MR. This will give reviewers and future readers helpful context to give an efficient review of the changes introduced.
MR acceptance checklist
Please evaluate this MR against the MR acceptance checklist. It helps you analyze changes to reduce risks in quality, performance, reliability, security, and maintainability.
Screenshots or screen recordings
Screenshots are required for UI changes, and strongly recommended for all other merge requests.
Before | After |
---|---|
How to set up and validate locally
Numbered steps to set up and validate the change are strongly suggested.
Related to #505353 (closed)
Merge request reports
Activity
changed milestone to %17.9
assigned to @julie_huang
added 1 commit
- ad9c337e - Update Bedrock documentation with guidance around IAM setup
1 Message This merge request adds or changes documentation files and requires Technical Writing review. The review should happen before merge, but can be post-merge if the merge request is time sensitive. Documentation review
The following files require a review from a technical writer:
-
doc/administration/self_hosted_models/supported_llm_serving_platforms.md
(Link to current live version)
The review does not need to block merging this merge request. See the:
-
Metadata for the
*.md
files that you've changed. The first few lines of each*.md
file identify the stage and group most closely associated with your docs change. - The Technical Writer assigned for that stage and group.
- Documentation workflows for information on when to assign a merge request for review.
If needed, you can retry the
danger-review
job that generated this comment.Generated by
DangerEdited by ****-
added docs-only label
removed docs-only label
requested review from @eduardobonet
- Resolved by Jon Glassman
Hey @eduardobonet would you mind reviewing this doc update please? Let me know if you think it could be worded better.
removed typefeature label
added typefeature label
added docs-only label
added typemaintenance label and removed typefeature label
added workflowin review label and removed workflowready for development label
@jglassman1 would you mind reviewing this doc update for Technical Writing? Thank yourequested review from @jglassman1
mentioned in issue #505353 (closed)
- Resolved by Julie Huang
- Resolved by Julie Huang
- Resolved by Jon Glassman
@mhamda @sean_carroll @julie_huang @eduardobonet it looks like we've got two MRs currently open that duplicate each other?
mentioned in merge request !178411 (closed)
added 1 commit
- 58189df5 - Apply reviewer suggestions for greater clarity
added 1 commit
- 8b5e0f40 - Apply reviewer suggestions for greater clarity
Hi
@jglassman1
,GitLab Bot has added the Technical Writing label because a Technical Writer has approved or merged this MR.
This message was generated automatically. Improve it or delete it.
added Technical Writing label
started a merge train
mentioned in commit 8a9d75cc
added workflowstaging-canary label and removed workflowin review label
added workflowcanary label and removed workflowstaging-canary label
added workflowstaging label and removed workflowcanary label
added workflowproduction label and removed workflowstaging label
added workflowpost-deploy-db-staging label and removed workflowproduction label
added workflowpost-deploy-db-production label and removed workflowpost-deploy-db-staging label