Retry only once for coverage endpoint
What does this MR do and why?
This is to reduce long running pipelines when mapping is enabled for scheduled runs (for omnibus and CNG pipelines). It works without needing a retry in the gdk
pipeline.
For example here the instance job took 78 mins: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/jobs/8279750021#L2597
This MR will help us enable coverband mapping for CNG pipeline without causing long running pipeline for omnibus (where mapping still fails) because same rule governs both pipelines in CI config.
References
Please include cross links to any resources that are relevant to this MR. This will give reviewers and future readers helpful context to give an efficient review of the changes introduced.
MR acceptance checklist
Please evaluate this MR against the MR acceptance checklist. It helps you analyze changes to reduce risks in quality, performance, reliability, security, and maintainability.
Screenshots or screen recordings
Screenshots are required for UI changes, and strongly recommended for all other merge requests.
Before | After |
---|---|
How to set up and validate locally
Numbered steps to set up and validate the change are strongly suggested.
Merge request reports
Activity
changed milestone to %17.7
added Sub-DepartmentTest Platform typemaintenance labels
assigned to @hmuralidhar
added pipelinetier-1 label
- A deleted user
added QA label
1 Message CHANGELOG missing: If this merge request needs a changelog entry, add the
Changelog
trailer to the commit message you want to add to the changelog.If this merge request doesn't need a CHANGELOG entry, feel free to ignore this message.
Reviewer roulette
Category Reviewer Maintainer QA @niskhakova
(UTC+1, 10 hours behind author)
@ddavison
(UTC-5, 16 hours behind author)
Please refer to documentation page for guidance on how you can benefit from the Reviewer Roulette, or use the GitLab Review Workload Dashboard to find other available reviewers.
If needed, you can retry the
danger-review
job that generated this comment.Generated by
Dangeradded Quality label
E2E Test Result Summary
allure-report-publisher
generated test report!e2e-test-on-gdk:
test report for cf6986f6expand test summary
+------------------------------------------------------------------+ | suites summary | +-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+ | | passed | failed | skipped | flaky | total | result | +-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+ | Create | 129 | 0 | 22 | 0 | 151 | ✅ | | Release | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | ✅ | | Verify | 43 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 45 | ✅ | | Plan | 76 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 76 | ✅ | | Package | 24 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 35 | ✅ | | Monitor | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | ✅ | | Data Stores | 33 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 34 | ✅ | | Govern | 75 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 78 | ✅ | | Secure | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | ✅ | | Fulfillment | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | ✅ | | Manage | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | ✅ | | Ai-powered | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ➖ | | Analytics | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | ✅ | +-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+ | Total | 402 | 0 | 41 | 0 | 443 | ✅ | +-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
e2e-test-on-cng:
test report for cf6986f6expand test summary
+------------------------------------------------------------------+ | suites summary | +-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+ | | passed | failed | skipped | flaky | total | result | +-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+ | Package | 24 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 38 | ✅ | | Verify | 49 | 0 | 16 | 0 | 65 | ✅ | | Create | 136 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 156 | ✅ | | Govern | 82 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 91 | ✅ | | Plan | 82 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 90 | ✅ | | Fulfillment | 2 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 9 | ✅ | | Monitor | 8 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 20 | ✅ | | Secure | 2 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 7 | ✅ | | Manage | 1 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 10 | ✅ | | Release | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6 | ✅ | | Data Stores | 33 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 43 | ✅ | | Ai-powered | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | ➖ | | Analytics | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | ✅ | | Growth | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | ➖ | | Configure | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | ➖ | | ModelOps | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ➖ | +-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+ | Total | 426 | 0 | 119 | 3 | 545 | ✅ | +-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
requested review from @niskhakova
- Resolved by Dan Davison
@niskhakova could you please review this change?
added pipeline:mr-approved label
added pipelinetier-2 label and removed pipelinetier-1 label
Before you set this MR to auto-merge
This merge request will progress on pipeline tiers until it reaches the last tier: pipelinetier-3. We will trigger a new pipeline for each transition to a higher tier.
Before you set this MR to auto-merge, please check the following:
- You are the last maintainer of this merge request
- The latest pipeline for this merge request is pipelinetier-3 (You can find which tier it is in the pipeline name)
- This pipeline is recent enough (created in the last 8 hours)
If all the criteria above apply, please set auto-merge for this merge request.
See pipeline tiers and merging a merge request for more details.
requested review from @ddavison
added pipelinetier-3 pipeline:run-e2e-omnibus-once labels and removed pipelinetier-2 label
started a merge train
mentioned in commit 82416408
added workflowstaging-canary label
added workflowcanary label and removed workflowstaging-canary label
added workflowstaging label and removed workflowcanary label
added workflowproduction label and removed workflowstaging label
added workflowpost-deploy-db-staging label and removed workflowproduction label
added workflowpost-deploy-db-production label and removed workflowpost-deploy-db-staging label
added releasedcandidate label
added releasedpublished label and removed releasedcandidate label