Remove enable_adherence_check_for_scanners feature flag
What does this MR do and why?
Remove enable_adherence_check_for_scanners feature flag
This commit removes feature flag enable_adherence_check_for_scanners
Changelog: changed
References
Please include cross links to any resources that are relevant to this MR This will give reviewers and future readers helpful context to give an efficient review of the changes introduced.
MR acceptance checklist
Please evaluate this MR against the MR acceptance checklist. It helps you analyze changes to reduce risks in quality, performance, reliability, security, and maintainability.
Screenshots or screen recordings
Screenshots are required for UI changes, and strongly recommended for all other merge requests.
Before | After |
---|---|
How to set up and validate locally
Numbered steps to set up and validate the change are strongly suggested.
Related to #492118 (closed)
Merge request reports
Activity
added devopsgovern feature flag groupcompliance sectionsec labels
assigned to @harsimarsandhu
added pipelinetier-1 label
- A deleted user
added backend documentation labels
1 Warning The master pipeline status page reported failures in If these jobs fail in your merge request with the same errors, then they are not caused by your changes.
Please check for any on-going incidents in the incident issue tracker or in the#master-broken
Slack channel.1 Message This merge request adds or changes documentation files. A review from the Technical Writing team before you merge is recommended. Reviews can happen after you merge. Documentation review
The following files require a review from a technical writer:
-
doc/user/compliance/compliance_center/compliance_standards_adherence_dashboard.md
(Link to current live version)
The review does not need to block merging this merge request. See the:
-
Metadata for the
*.md
files that you've changed. The first few lines of each*.md
file identify the stage and group most closely associated with your docs change. - The Technical Writer assigned for that stage and group.
- Documentation workflows for information on when to assign a merge request for review.
Reviewer roulette
Category Reviewer Maintainer backend @ngala
(UTC+5.5, same timezone as author)
@ahuntsman
(UTC-6, 11.5 hours behind author)
Please refer to documentation page for guidance on how you can benefit from the Reviewer Roulette, or use the GitLab Review Workload Dashboard to find other available reviewers.
If needed, you can retry the
danger-review
job that generated this comment.Generated by
Danger-
- Resolved by 🤖 GitLab Bot 🤖
Proper labels assigned to this merge request. Please ignore me.
@harsimarsandhu
- please see the following guidance and update this merge request.1 Error Please add typebug typefeature, or typemaintenance label to this merge request. Edited by 🤖 GitLab Bot 🤖
- Resolved by Evan Read
Hey @marcogreg could you please review backend?
requested review from @marcogreg
requested review from @bmarjanovic
added pipeline:mr-approved label
added pipelinetier-2 label and removed pipelinetier-1 label
Before you set this MR to auto-merge
This merge request will progress on pipeline tiers until it reaches the last tier: pipelinetier-3. We will trigger a new pipeline for each transition to a higher tier.
Before you set this MR to auto-merge, please check the following:
- You are the last maintainer of this merge request
- The latest pipeline for this merge request is pipelinetier-3 (You can find which tier it is in the pipeline name)
- This pipeline is recent enough (created in the last 8 hours)
If all the criteria above apply, please set auto-merge for this merge request.
See pipeline tiers and merging a merge request for more details.
mentioned in issue gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com#34243
E2E Test Result Summary
allure-report-publisher
generated test report!e2e-test-on-gdk:
test report for 18d09aeaexpand test summary
+------------------------------------------------------------------+ | suites summary | +-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+ | | passed | failed | skipped | flaky | total | result | +-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+ | Create | 129 | 0 | 22 | 0 | 151 | ✅ | | Secure | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | ✅ | | Plan | 76 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 76 | ✅ | | Package | 24 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 35 | ✅ | | Data Stores | 29 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 34 | ✅ | | Analytics | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | ✅ | | Verify | 43 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 45 | ✅ | | Fulfillment | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | ✅ | | Monitor | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | ✅ | | Govern | 75 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 78 | ✅ | | Manage | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | ✅ | | Release | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | ✅ | | Ai-powered | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ➖ | +-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+ | Total | 398 | 0 | 45 | 0 | 443 | ✅ | +-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
e2e-test-on-cng:
test report for 18d09aeaexpand test summary
+------------------------------------------------------------------+ | suites summary | +-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+ | | passed | failed | skipped | flaky | total | result | +-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+ | Govern | 84 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 93 | ✅ | | Verify | 50 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 65 | ✅ | | Create | 140 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 160 | ✅ | | Data Stores | 29 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 43 | ✅ | | Plan | 86 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 94 | ✅ | | Monitor | 8 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 20 | ✅ | | Secure | 1 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 7 | ✅ | | Analytics | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | ✅ | | Fulfillment | 2 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 9 | ✅ | | Release | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6 | ✅ | | Package | 24 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 38 | ✅ | | Manage | 1 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 10 | ✅ | | Growth | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | ➖ | | Configure | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | ➖ | | Ai-powered | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | ➖ | | ModelOps | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ➖ | +-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+ | Total | 432 | 0 | 123 | 3 | 555 | ✅ | +-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
changed milestone to %17.6
added typefeature label
- Resolved by Harsimar Sandhu
added pipelinetier-3 pipeline:run-e2e-omnibus-once labels and removed pipelinetier-2 label
requested review from @eread
- Resolved by Harsimar Sandhu
requested review from @eread
mentioned in merge request gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com!135867 (merged)
Hi
@eread
,GitLab Bot has added the Technical Writing label because a Technical Writer has approved or merged this MR.
This message was generated automatically. Improve it or delete it.
added Technical Writing label
started a merge train
mentioned in commit 63c026be
added workflowstaging-canary label
added workflowcanary label and removed workflowstaging-canary label
added workflowstaging label and removed workflowcanary label
added workflowproduction label and removed workflowstaging label
added workflowpost-deploy-db-production label and removed workflowproduction label
added releasedcandidate label
mentioned in issue #492118 (closed)
added releasedpublished label and removed releasedcandidate label