Create separate feature flag for require_organization for Project Model

added devopsdata stores grouptenant scale sectioncore platform typefeature labels

Thanks for your contribution to GitLab @rutvikchandla3!

Did you know about our community forks? Working from there will make your contribution process easier. Please check it out!

If you need help, page a coach by clicking here or come say hi on Discord.
When you're ready, request a review by clicking here.
We welcome AI-generated contributions and offer complimentary access to GitLab Duo! Check out the top of the merge request description to learn more about using AI while contributing.
To add labels to your merge request, comment @gitlab-bot label ~"label1" ~"label2".

This message was generated automatically. You're welcome to improve it.

added Community contribution workflowin dev labels

assigned to @rutvikchandla3

changed the description

added linked-issue label

added 1 commit

010bb565 - Update MR and rollout link

Compare with previous version

marked this merge request as ready

mentioned in issue #501257 (closed)

@rutvikchandla3 Thanks for picking this up! Highly appreciated!

It looks like it is ready for review. I will assign myself as reviewer and will have a look this week.

requested review from @rutgerwessels

@rutvikchandla3 Thanks for picking this up. I have two small change requests. Let me know when you applied them, then I can have another look.

requested changes

added 1 commit

c71ae0d8 - Update rollout link and spec description

Compare with previous version

requested review from @rutgerwessels

resolved all threads

approved this merge request

@rutvikchandla3 Thanks for the changes. Looks good, approved!

@abdwdd Can you take care of backend maintainer review?

requested review from @abdwdd

added pipeline:mr-approved label

added pipelinetier-3 pipeline:run-e2e-omnibus-once labels and removed pipelinetier-1 label

Before you set this MR to auto-merge

This merge request will progress on pipeline tiers until it reaches the last tier: pipelinetier-3.

Before you set this MR to auto-merge, please check the following:

You are the last maintainer of this merge request
The latest pipeline for this merge request is pipelinetier-3 (You can find which tier it is in the pipeline name)
This pipeline is recent enough (created in the last 8 hours)

If all the criteria above apply, please set auto-merge for this merge request.

See pipeline tiers and merging a merge request for more details.

approved this merge request

resolved all threads

enabled automatic add to merge train when checks pass

added backend feature flag labels

	1 Warning
	This merge request does not refer to an existing milestone.

1 Message

CHANGELOG missing:

If this merge request needs a changelog entry, add the Changelog trailer to the commit message you want to add to the changelog.

If this merge request doesn't need a CHANGELOG entry, feel free to ignore this message.

Reviewer roulette

Category	Reviewer	Maintainer
backend	`@SamWord` (UTC-4)	`@ahmed.hemdan` (UTC+1)

Please refer to documentation page for guidance on how you can benefit from the Reviewer Roulette, or use the GitLab Review Workload Dashboard to find other available reviewers.

If needed, you can retry the danger-review job that generated this comment.

Generated by Danger

E2E Test Result Summary

allure-report-publisher generated test report!

e2e-test-on-gdk: test report for 8433dbda

expand test summary

+------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                          suites summary                          |
+-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
|             | passed | failed | skipped | flaky | total | result |
+-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
| Plan        | 152    | 0      | 0       | 0     | 152   | ✅     |
| Data Stores | 66     | 0      | 0       | 0     | 66    | ✅     |
| Verify      | 90     | 0      | 2       | 0     | 92    | ✅     |
| Create      | 244    | 0      | 4       | 0     | 248   | ✅     |
| Govern      | 146    | 0      | 6       | 2     | 152   | ✅     |
| Monitor     | 16     | 0      | 0       | 0     | 16    | ✅     |
| Package     | 34     | 0      | 0       | 0     | 34    | ✅     |
| Release     | 10     | 0      | 0       | 0     | 10    | ✅     |
| Analytics   | 4      | 0      | 0       | 0     | 4     | ✅     |
| Fulfillment | 4      | 0      | 0       | 0     | 4     | ✅     |
| Secure      | 8      | 0      | 0       | 0     | 8     | ✅     |
| Manage      | 2      | 0      | 0       | 0     | 2     | ✅     |
+-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
| Total       | 776    | 0      | 12      | 2     | 788   | ✅     |
+-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+

e2e-test-on-cng: test report for 8433dbda

expand test summary

+------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                          suites summary                          |
+-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
|             | passed | failed | skipped | flaky | total | result |
+-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
| Verify      | 50     | 0      | 15      | 10    | 65    | ✅     |
| Govern      | 81     | 0      | 12      | 10    | 93    | ✅     |
| Create      | 139    | 0      | 21      | 21    | 160   | ✅     |
| Plan        | 86     | 0      | 8       | 14    | 94    | ✅     |
| Growth      | 0      | 0      | 2       | 0     | 2     | ➖     |
| Package     | 24     | 0      | 14      | 0     | 38    | ✅     |
| Monitor     | 8      | 0      | 12      | 0     | 20    | ✅     |
| Data Stores | 33     | 0      | 10      | 1     | 43    | ✅     |
| Release     | 5      | 0      | 1       | 0     | 6     | ✅     |
| Fulfillment | 2      | 0      | 7       | 0     | 9     | ✅     |
| Secure      | 1      | 0      | 6       | 0     | 7     | ✅     |
| Manage      | 1      | 0      | 9       | 0     | 10    | ✅     |
| Ai-powered  | 0      | 0      | 2       | 0     | 2     | ➖     |
| Analytics   | 2      | 0      | 0       | 0     | 2     | ✅     |
| Configure   | 0      | 0      | 3       | 0     | 3     | ➖     |
| ModelOps    | 0      | 0      | 1       | 0     | 1     | ➖     |
+-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+
| Total       | 432    | 0      | 123     | 56    | 555   | ✅     |
+-------------+--------+--------+---------+-------+-------+--------+

added 1 commit

8433dbda - Fix failing UT

Compare with previous version

reset approvals from @abdwdd and @rutgerwessels by pushing to the branch

requested review from @rutgerwessels

requested review from @abdwdd

approved this merge request

enabled automatic add to merge train when checks pass

started a merge train

merged

@rutvikchandla3, how was your code review experience with this merge request? Please tell us how we can continue to iterate and improve:

React with a or a on this comment to describe your experience.
Create a new comment starting with @gitlab-bot feedback below, and leave any additional feedback you have for us in the comment.

As a benefit of being a GitLab Community Contributor, you can request access to GitLab Duo. With Code Suggestions, Chat and more AI-powered features, GitLab Duo helps to boost your efficiency and effectiveness by reducing the time required to write and understand code. Visit the Duo access project to request a GitLab Duo license and learn more about the benefits of GitLab Duo.

Subscribe to the GitLab Community Newsletter for contributor-focused content and opportunities to level up.

Thanks for your help!

This message was generated automatically. You're welcome to improve it.