Unified CLI Experience - Duo CLI and glab Consolidation

Everyone can contribute. Help move this issue forward while earning points, leveling up and collecting rewards.

  • Close this issue

Consolidate Duo CLI and glab into a single, unified CLI experience that supports both traditional glab commands and agentic AI-powered workflows, with robust user and administrative controls. This is a GA requirement.

Business Objective

Provide users with a seamless, future-proof CLI experience that combines the power of AI-native agentic workflows with traditional command-line functionality, while ensuring enterprise-grade administrative control and user choice.

Success Criteria (up for discussion)

  • Single CLI entry point accessible likely via glab
  • Intelligent routing between traditional glab commands and agentic requests
  • User-level and admin-level opt-in/opt-out controls fully functional
  • Zero regression in existing glab functionality for users who opt out of AI features
  • Smooth user experience that doesn't require users to switch between tools
  • Administrative controls that can completely disable Duo CLI features when needed

User Stories

Core Functionality

  1. As a developer, I want to use a single CLI tool so that I don't have to switch between glab and Duo CLI
  2. As a user, I want to execute traditional glab commands and receive expected outputs without any AI interference
  3. As a user, I want to make agentic requests within the same CLI and have intelligent workflows execute automatically
  4. As a CLI user, I want the system to intelligently detect whether my input is a traditional command or an agentic request

Security & Controls

  1. As an administrator, I want to disable Duo CLI functionality organization-wide so that no AI features are available to authenticated users
  2. As an administrator, I want to enable Duo CLI as an opt-in feature so that users can choose to adopt AI capabilities
  3. As a user, I want to opt out of AI features so that no unexpected binaries or AI functionality runs on my machine
  4. As a user, I want to opt into AI features so that I can leverage agentic workflows when I need them

Experience

  1. As a user, I want a clear indication of when I'm using traditional vs. agentic mode
  2. As a user, I want graceful error handling when the system misinterprets my command intent
  3. As a user, I want the ability to force traditional or agentic mode when the auto-detection isn't what I intended

Technical Considerations

  • Architecture that doesn't regress from current implementation
  • Intelligent input parsing and routing mechanism
  • Permission and authentication layer for admin/user controls
  • Binary distribution and installation controls
  • Performance considerations for input detection and routing

Dependencies

  • Product alignment with @phikai on consolidation strategy
  • Engineering team input on technical approach
  • Security review of opt-in mechanisms and binary controls
  • UX research on input detection and mode switching @Sam_Reiss

Open Questions

  • What is the technical approach for distinguishing traditional commands from agentic requests?
  • How do we handle edge cases where input could be interpreted either way?
  • What is the installation and update mechanism that respects opt-in controls?
  • How do we maintain feature parity with existing glab while adding new capabilities?
  • What metrics will we track to measure success post-GA?
Edited Jan 22, 2026 by 🤖 GitLab Bot 🤖
Assignee Loading
Time tracking Loading