Job timeout risk: ee/spec/models/geo_node_status_spec.rb ran much longer than expected
Why was this issue created?
ee/spec/models/geo_node_status_spec.rb was reported to have:
- exceeded Knapsack's expected runtime by at least 50%, and
- been identified as a notable pipeline bottleneck and a job timeout risk
Suggested steps for investigation
- To reproduce in CI by running test files in the same order, you can follow the steps listed here.
- Identify if a specific test case is stalling the run time. Hint: You can search the job's log for
Starting example group ee/spec/models/geo_node_status_spec.rb
and view the elapsed time after each test case in the proceeding lines starting with[RSpecRunTime]
. - If the test file is large, consider refactoring it into multiple files to allow better test parallelization across runners.
- If the run time cannot be fixed in time, consider quarantine the spec(s) to restore performance.
Run time details
- Reported from pipeline 4750124 created at
2025-10-19T21:19:15Z
Field | Value |
---|---|
Job URL | rspec-ee-unit-pg16-single-db-25-39 |
Job total RSpec suite run time | expected: 41 minutes 47.67 seconds , actual: 79 minutes 53.31 seconds
|
Spec file run time | expected: 9 minutes 8.47 seconds , actual: 16 minutes 17.61 seconds
|
Spec file weight |
20.4% of total suite run time |
- Reported from pipeline 4759398 created at
2025-10-21T15:18:09Z
Field | Value |
---|---|
Job URL | rspec-ee-unit-pg16-25-39 |
Job total RSpec suite run time | expected: 43 minutes 46.97 seconds , actual: 71 minutes 4.05 seconds
|
Spec file run time | expected: 9 minutes 47.16 seconds , actual: 17 minutes 0.98 second
|
Spec file weight |
23.94% of total suite run time |
Edited by KNAPSACK_REPORT_ISSUES_PROJECT_TOKEN