Better handle stubbing of trial types in ce
The following discussion from !204747 (merged) should be addressed:
-
@dstull started a discussion: (+1 comment) thought (non-blocking):
I'm wondering how we should longer term deal with situations like this where:
- FOSS breaks because the helper is only defined in
ee - We only technically need this stub in
ee, but due to code execution with full gitlab ce + ee, we need a stub here.
I wonder if we do something like:
- in
cecreate a helper with needed empty methods - in
eethe helper will have actual methods.
I think the above matches our non spec code override patterns the best.
Any thoughts?
- FOSS breaks because the helper is only defined in
Edited by Doug Stull