Refactor index_over_watermark_check in zoekt scheduling service
Everyone can contribute. Help move this issue forward while earning points, leveling up and collecting rewards.
The following discussion from !172790 (merged) should be addressed:
-
@maddievn started a discussion: (+1 comment) meta question: Should we rethink this event a bit now that we no longer use the watermark level attribute in the event? We can add a scope called
:should_update_watermark_levelwhich returns all indices that need to be updated (instead of one event per watermark level) inindex_over_watermark_checkand this handler simply callsupdate_reserved_storage_bytesfor the indices. Let me know what you think!
Edited by 🤖 GitLab Bot 🤖