Follow-up from "Set failure reason for non-persisted pipelines"
The following discussions from !138390 (merged) should be addressed:
-
@allison.browne started a discussion: (+2 comments) Did we change to behavior when the drop_reason is nil? I do see at least one case where the drop_reason is nil.
Note: the main ask here is for test coverage when the drop_reason is nil which is uncovered currently.
-
@allison.browne started a discussion: non-blocking:
context 'when the drop reason is not persistable' do
Edited by Allison Browne