Follow-up from "Utilize dormant user period in application settings"

The following discussions from !95496 (merged) should be addressed:

• @dstull started a discussion:

  suggestion (non-blocking):

  I can see the above assertion - so this is non blocking as that is outside of this MR

  However, it would be great if we could test what you see, when possible for feature specs. In this case, it would mean something like this (as you can't really see the selector w/o inspecting the dom)

              expect(page).to have_no_content('Period of inactivity (days)')

  or we could utilize have_no_field or .not_to have_field if desired