better description / grouping of "experimental" languages
Problem to solve
Some users seem to be unclear on what experimental is and the implication of that - ref: #35381 (closed)
Intended users
Personas are described at https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/product-marketing/roles-personas/ -->
Further details
Proposal
We should better convey what "Experimental" means and the support implications of that to clearly in the docs to set better expectations around the lack of trust and support in experimental languages.
Split the supported/unsupported types into two tables like in the upstream docs https://github.com/pivotal/LicenseFinder#supported-project-types.
Documentation
Edit https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/application_security/license_compliance/#supported-languages-and-package-managers and split the table by creating a new one under a new heading ### Experimental support
under ## Supported languages and package managers
.