Add better error handling and field validation throughout the secure configuration area (tool configuration)
Recommendation from Secure - Audit of scanner configuration UI
Problem to solve
The 3 scanners with UI configuration options (SAST, DAST, API Fuzzing) all handle field errors differently. Most fields have no validation. This issue is to explore how we might introduce consistent and informative error handling and field validation across the various security tool configuration workflows.
Edited by 🤖 GitLab Bot 🤖