Misleading documentation for repository migration to LFS

For the migration of an existing repository to use Git LFS there is a link on the GitLab LFS documentation page (https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/topics/git/lfs/#git-large-file-storage-lfs). This link points to the following page: https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/topics/git/lfs/migrate_to_git_lfs.html

In this page the only/standard tool to help migrate to Git LFS is BFG.

However, if you look at the GitLab documentation page about reducing repository size (https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/project/repository/reducing_the_repo_size_using_git.html) it is mentioned that GitLab prefers git-filter-repo over git-filter-branch and BFG.

This may be misleading. Currently, (also from reading the git-filter-repo documentation) I understand that this may be the best choice but there is some uncertainty about that.