Follow-up from "Hashed Storage is enabled by default on new installations"
The following discussion from gitlab-ce!29586 should be addressed:
-
@brodock started a discussion: (+2 comments) some context on specs failure (gitaly log):
time="2019-06-13T15:54:34+02:00" level=error msg="fatal: Couldn't find remote ref HEAD\\nfatal: the remote end hung up unexpectedly\\n" grpc.meta.auth_version=v2 grpc.meta.client_name=gitlab-web grpc.method=FetchIntoObjectPool grpc.request.deadline="2019-06-13T15:55:29+02:00" grpc.request.fullMethod=/gitaly.ObjectPoolService/FetchIntoObjectPool grpc.service=gitaly.ObjectPoolService grpc.start_time="2019-06-13T15:54:34+02:00" peer.address= span.kind=server system=grpc time="2019-06-13T15:54:34+02:00" level=error msg="finished unary call with code Internal" error="rpc error: code = Internal desc = exit status 128" grpc.code=Internal grpc.meta.auth_version=v2 grpc.meta.client_name=gitlab-web grpc.method=FetchIntoObjectPool grpc.request.deadline="2019-06-13T15:55:29+02:00" grpc.request.fullMethod=/gitaly.ObjectPoolService/FetchIntoObjectPool grpc.service=gitaly.ObjectPoolService grpc.start_time="2019-06-13T15:54:34+02:00" grpc.time_ms=35.663 peer.address= span.kind=server system=grpc
(https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/-/jobs/230655211)
rspec ./spec/finders/fork_projects_finder_spec.rb:29 # ForkProjectsFinder#execute without a user
rspec ./spec/finders/fork_projects_finder_spec.rb:35 # ForkProjectsFinder#execute with a user
rspec ./spec/finders/fork_projects_finder_spec.rb:41 # ForkProjectsFinder#execute with a member
before the change to hashed_storage_enabled: true, the failed specs would not try to use repository_pool because this would be false:
def git_objects_poolable?
hashed_storage?(:repository) &&
public? &&
repository_exists? &&
Gitlab::CurrentSettings.hashed_storage_enabled &&
Feature.enabled?(:object_pools, self)
end
As this now true, we are having a failed spec. I'm still trying to determine if this is an issue or not.
In https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/29586 I've stubbed the feature flag to disable pool repositories. We should investigate if this is a legitimate failure or just a fluke on how we are setting up the tests.
Ideally we should test both with and without pool repositories states.
Edited by Gabriel Mazetto