Duplicated `file_format` definition and streaming adapters between Job Artifact and Pipeline Artifact
The following discussion from !37969 (merged) should be addressed:
-
@dosuken123 started a discussion: We'd likely provide the same
FILE_FORMAT_ADAPTERS
for reading these artifacts. Does it make sense to have the shared concern to provide the samefile_formats
enum? This would be actually a context in Artifact ~"technical debt" .