Follow-up from "Add secure binaries template"
The following discussion from !28566 (merged) should be addressed:
-
@fcatteau started a discussion: (+11 comments) Just an aside. When implementing #10290 (closed) versions will be specific to each analyzers, and so we'll have to expose
GEMNASIUM_VERSION
,BANDIT_VERSION
, etc.Actually, maybe it's easier to push to a shared, hardcoded tag like
latest
orstable
, and set the[ANALYZER_NAME]_VERSION
to match this. cc @theoretick