Follow-up from "Add mutation concern to resolve a single issuable"
The following discussion from !25987 (merged) should be addressed:
-
@egrieff started a discussion: (+2 comments) Note: I see some strange behaviour in
Resolvers::MergeRequestsResolver
when the result ofResolvers::ProjectResolver
is empty, so I'll investigate further and add more specs in a follow-up MR.
Edited by Eugenia Grieff