Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 99e7b038 authored by Sincheol (David) Kim's avatar Sincheol (David) Kim
Browse files

Revert "Load review requested MRs in assignee filter"

This reverts commit 550f2982.
parent 0745b989
No related branches found
No related tags found
1 merge request!45602Revert "Load review requested MRs in assignee filter"
......@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ def preload_for_collection
common_attributes + [:project, project: :namespace]
when 'MergeRequest'
common_attributes + [
:target_project, :latest_merge_request_diff, :approvals, :approved_by_users, :reviewers,
:target_project, :latest_merge_request_diff, :approvals, :approved_by_users,
source_project: :route, head_pipeline: :project, target_project: :namespace
]
end
......
......@@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ def by_assignee(items)
elsif params.filter_by_any_assignee?
items.assigned
elsif params.assignee
items_assigned_to(items, params.assignee)
items.assigned_to(params.assignee)
elsif params.assignee_id? || params.assignee_username? # assignee not found
items.none
else
......@@ -407,10 +407,6 @@ def by_assignee(items)
end
end
def items_assigned_to(items, user)
items.assigned_to(user)
end
def by_negated_assignee(items)
# We want CE users to be able to say "Issues not assigned to either PersonA nor PersonB"
if not_params.assignees.present?
......
......@@ -164,10 +164,6 @@ def by_approvals(items)
end
# rubocop: enable CodeReuse/Finder
def items_assigned_to(items, user)
MergeRequest.from_union([super, items.reviewer_assigned_to(user)])
end
def by_deployments(items)
# Until this feature flag is enabled permanently, we retain the old
# filtering behaviour/code.
......
......@@ -302,10 +302,6 @@ def public_merge_status
includes(:metrics)
end
scope :reviewer_assigned_to, ->(user) do
where("EXISTS (SELECT TRUE FROM merge_request_reviewers WHERE user_id = ? AND merge_request_id = merge_requests.id)", user.id)
end
after_save :keep_around_commit, unless: :importing?
alias_attribute :project, :target_project
......
......@@ -52,29 +52,20 @@
end
context 'merge requests exist' do
let_it_be(:author_user) { create(:user) }
let(:label) { create(:label) }
let!(:assigned_merge_request) do
create(:merge_request,
assignees: [current_user],
source_project: project,
author: author_user)
end
let!(:review_requested_merge_request) do
create(:merge_request,
reviewers: [current_user],
source_branch: 'review',
source_project: project,
author: author_user)
author: create(:user))
end
let!(:assigned_merge_request_from_fork) do
create(:merge_request,
source_branch: 'markdown', assignees: [current_user],
target_project: public_project, source_project: forked_project,
author: author_user)
author: create(:user))
end
let!(:authored_merge_request) do
......@@ -103,7 +94,7 @@
create(:merge_request,
source_branch: 'fix',
source_project: project,
author: author_user)
author: create(:user))
end
before do
......@@ -120,10 +111,6 @@
expect(page).not_to have_content(labeled_merge_request.title)
end
it 'shows review requested merge requests' do
expect(page).to have_content(review_requested_merge_request.title)
end
it 'shows authored merge requests', :js do
reset_filters
input_filtered_search("author:=#{current_user.to_reference}")
......
......@@ -333,8 +333,6 @@ def find(label_name)
end
context 'assignee filtering' do
let_it_be(:user3) { create(:user) }
let(:issuables) { described_class.new(user, params).execute }
it_behaves_like 'assignee ID filter' do
......@@ -353,6 +351,7 @@ def find(label_name)
merge_request3.assignees = [user2, user3]
end
let_it_be(:user3) { create(:user) }
let(:params) { { assignee_username: [user2.username, user3.username] } }
let(:expected_issuables) { [merge_request3] }
end
......@@ -367,6 +366,7 @@ def find(label_name)
end
it_behaves_like 'no assignee filter' do
let_it_be(:user3) { create(:user) }
let(:expected_issuables) { [merge_request4, merge_request5] }
end
......@@ -374,54 +374,30 @@ def find(label_name)
let(:expected_issuables) { [merge_request1, merge_request2, merge_request3] }
end
context 'with just reviewers' do
it_behaves_like 'assignee username filter' do
before do
merge_request4.reviewers = [user3]
merge_request4.assignees = []
end
let(:params) { { assignee_username: [user3.username] } }
let(:expected_issuables) { [merge_request4] }
end
end
context 'with an additional reviewer' do
it_behaves_like 'assignee username filter' do
before do
merge_request3.assignees = [user3]
merge_request4.reviewers = [user3]
end
context 'filtering by group milestone' do
let(:group_milestone) { create(:milestone, group: group) }
let(:params) { { assignee_username: [user3.username] } }
let(:expected_issuables) { [merge_request3, merge_request4] }
before do
merge_request1.update!(milestone: group_milestone)
merge_request2.update!(milestone: group_milestone)
end
end
end
context 'filtering by group milestone' do
let(:group_milestone) { create(:milestone, group: group) }
it 'returns merge requests assigned to that group milestone' do
params = { milestone_title: group_milestone.title }
before do
merge_request1.update!(milestone: group_milestone)
merge_request2.update!(milestone: group_milestone)
end
it 'returns merge requests assigned to that group milestone' do
params = { milestone_title: group_milestone.title }
merge_requests = described_class.new(user, params).execute
merge_requests = described_class.new(user, params).execute
expect(merge_requests).to contain_exactly(merge_request1, merge_request2)
end
expect(merge_requests).to contain_exactly(merge_request1, merge_request2)
end
context 'using NOT' do
let(:params) { { not: { milestone_title: group_milestone.title } } }
context 'using NOT' do
let(:params) { { not: { milestone_title: group_milestone.title } } }
it 'returns MRs not assigned to that group milestone' do
merge_requests = described_class.new(user, params).execute
it 'returns MRs not assigned to that group milestone' do
merge_requests = described_class.new(user, params).execute
expect(merge_requests).to contain_exactly(merge_request3, merge_request4, merge_request5)
expect(merge_requests).to contain_exactly(merge_request3, merge_request4, merge_request5)
end
end
end
end
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment