Skip to content

Store traces on disk

Kamil Trzciński requested to merge store-traces-on-disk into master

What does this MR do?

This follows-up the !1292 (merged).

Makes all traces to be stored in temp files instead of memory, really allowing to handle big traces.

Consider, that this is not yet efficient (or not tested), as we need to understand the pressure on I/O.

Why was this MR needed?

Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?

Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

  • Documentation created/updated
  • Added tests for this feature/bug
  • In case of conflicts with master - branch was rebased

What are the relevant issue numbers?

Edited by Kamil Trzciński

Merge request reports