• Nick Thomas's avatar
    Add a benchmark for helpers.ShellEscape and optimise it · 8ea124b6
    Nick Thomas authored
    The improvement is 4 (430 to 0.02 seconds) orders of magnitude, and
    particularly affects large files specified with the `tls-ca-file` configuration
    The problem was successive string allocations - the for { out += oneChar }
    pattern is death to any garbage collector, and there are several allocations
    per byte as well(!)
    Switching to a `bytes.Buffer` for output (conservatively set to 2x the size of
    the input string) and avoiding most addtional allocations and calls to
    `fmt.Sprintf` is super-helpful.
shell_escape_test.go 1.02 KB