Refactor: rename handler receiver from a to h to be more accurate

• Please check this box if this contribution uses AI-generated content (including content generated by GitLab Duo features) as outlined in the GitLab DCO & CLA. As a benefit of being a GitLab Community Contributor, you can request access to GitLab Duo.

What does this MR do?

Refactor: rename handler receiver from a to h to be more accurate

Closes #761 (closed)

TODO

• Feature flag
  • Added feature flag:
  • This feature does not require a feature flag
• I added the Changelog trailer to the commits that need to be included in the changelog (e.g. Changelog: added)
• I added unit tests or they are not required
• I added acceptance tests or they are not required
• I added documentation (or it's not required)
• I followed code review guidelines
• I followed Go Style guidelines

added devopsplan groupknowledge sectiondev typemaintenance labels

added Leading Organization label

added Leading Organization label

Thanks for your contribution to GitLab @max-wittig!

• If you need help, page a coach by clicking here or come say hi on Discord.
• When you're ready, request a review by clicking here.
• We welcome AI-generated contributions and offer complimentary access to GitLab Duo! Check out the top of the merge request description to learn more about using AI while contributing.
• To add labels to your merge request, comment @gitlab-bot label ~"label1" ~"label2".

This message was generated automatically. You're welcome to improve it.

added Community contribution workflowin dev labels

assigned to @max-wittig

changed the description

This merge request will be counted as part of the running Hackathon!

Find yourself in the Hackathon Leaderboard or check out the Hackathon page for more information!

This message was generated automatically. You're welcome to improve it.

added Hackathon label

added linked-issue label

added 1 commit

• dda42f7c - Refactor: rename handler receiver from a to h to be more accurate

Compare with previous version

@max-wittig Thank you for the participation. Let us know once the MR is ready for the review.

Hey there @aturinske, could you please help @ngala out?

This message was generated automatically. You're welcome to improve it.

requested review from @aturinske

removed review request for @aturinske

resolved all threads

marked the checklist item This feature does not require a feature flag as completed

marked the checklist item I added unit tests or they are not required as completed

marked the checklist item I added acceptance tests or they are not required as completed

marked the checklist item I added documentation (or it's not required) as completed

marked the checklist item I followed code review guidelines as completed

marked the checklist item I followed Go Style guidelines as completed

requested review from @ngala

approved this merge request

@max-wittig LGTM. Thank you.

@jaime Can you please perform maintainer review for this community contribution? Thank you.

requested review from @jaime

Reviewer roulette

Changes that require review have been detected! A merge request is normally reviewed by both a reviewer and a maintainer in its primary category and by a maintainer in all other categories.

To spread load more evenly across eligible reviewers, Danger has picked a candidate for each review slot. Feel free to override these selections if you think someone else would be better-suited or use the GitLab Review Workload Dashboard to find other available reviewers.

To read more on how to use the reviewer roulette, please take a look at the Engineering workflow and code review guidelines. Please consider assigning a reviewer or maintainer who is a domain expert in the area of the merge request.

Once you've decided who will review this merge request, mention them as you normally would! Danger does not automatically notify them for you.

Reviewer	Maintainer
@arun.sori (UTC+2)	@nolith (UTC+2)

If needed, you can retry the danger-review job that generated this comment.

Generated by Danger

changed milestone to %17.6

added workflowin review label and removed workflowin dev label

approved this merge request

started a merge train

merged

mentioned in commit d9954afc

@max-wittig, how was your code review experience with this merge request? Please tell us how we can continue to iterate and improve:

1. React with a or a on this comment to describe your experience.
2. Create a new comment starting with @gitlab-bot feedback below, and leave any additional feedback you have for us in the comment.

As a benefit of being a GitLab Community Contributor, you can request access to GitLab Duo. With Code Suggestions, Chat and more AI-powered features, GitLab Duo helps to boost your efficiency and effectiveness by reducing the time required to write and understand code. Visit the Duo access project to request a GitLab Duo license and learn more about the benefits of GitLab Duo.

Subscribe to the GitLab Community Newsletter for contributor-focused content and opportunities to level up.

Thanks for your help!

This message was generated automatically. You're welcome to improve it.