Follow-up from "Docs: Improve SCIM documentation"
The following discussion from !31091 (merged) should be addressed:
-
@eread started a discussion: (+1 comment) Thanks @tristan, you've done a nice job.
Just two minor things from me. I think we could've made use of more numbered lists rather than new sections (I wouldn't normally suggest starting a section with "First, ..." and "Next, ...") but you've improved the topic either way!