Draft: Provide run_rake method in commands
-
Please check this box if this contribution uses AI-generated content (including content generated by GitLab Duo features) as outlined in the GitLab DCO & CLA. As a benefit of being a GitLab Community Contributor, you receive complimentary access to GitLab Duo.
What does this merge request do and why?
Provide run_rake method in commands
Provides generic run_rake method in base command class and refactors existing rake calls to use it.
How to set up and validate locally
Numbered steps to set up and validate the change are strongly suggested.
Impacted categories
The following categories relate to this merge request:
-
gdk-reliability - e.g. When a GDK action fails to complete. -
gdk-usability - e.g. Improvements or suggestions around how the GDK functions. -
gdk-performance - e.g. When a GDK action is slow or times out.
Merge request checklist
-
This change is backward compatible. If not, please include steps to communicate to our users. -
Tests added for new functionality. If not, please raise an issue to follow-up. -
Documentation added/updated, if needed. -
Announcement added, if change is notable. -
gdk doctor
test added, if needed.
Closes #907 (closed)
Merge request reports
Activity
added Engineering Productivity sectiondev typefeature labels
Thanks for your contribution to GitLab @Bubbis!
- If you need help, page a coach by clicking here or come say hi on Discord.
- When you're ready, request a review by clicking here.
- We welcome AI-generated contributions and offer complimentary access to GitLab Duo!
This message was generated automatically. Improve it or delete it.
added 1st contribution Community contribution workflowin dev labels
assigned to @Bubbis
This merge request will be counted as part of the running Hackathon!
Find yourself in the Hackathon Leaderboard or check out the Hackathon page for more information!
This message was generated automatically. Improve it or delete it.
added Hackathon label
1 Warning This merge request does not refer to an existing milestone. Reviewer roulette
Changes that require review have been detected! A merge request is normally reviewed by both a reviewer and a maintainer in its primary category and by a maintainer in all other categories.
To spread load more evenly across eligible reviewers, Danger has picked a candidate for each review slot. Feel free to override these selections if you think someone else would be better-suited or use the GitLab Review Workload Dashboard to find other available reviewers.
To read more on how to use the reviewer roulette, please take a look at the Engineering workflow and code review guidelines. Please consider assigning a reviewer or maintainer who is a domain expert in the area of the merge request.
Once you've decided who will review this merge request, mention them as you normally would! Danger does not automatically notify them for you.
Category Reviewer Maintainer None @garyh
(UTC-6)
@kkloss
(UTC+1)
If needed, you can retry the
danger-review
job that generated this comment.Generated by
Dangeradded linked-issue label
@Bubbis, how was your code review experience with this merge request? Please tell us how we can continue to iterate and improve:
- React with a
or a on this comment to describe your experience. - Create a new comment starting with
@gitlab-bot feedback
below, and leave any additional feedback you have for us in the comment.
As a benefit of being a GitLab Community Contributor, you have access to GitLab Duo, our AI-powered features. With Code Suggestions, Chat, Root Cause Analysis and more AI-powered features, GitLab Duo helps to boost your efficiency and effectiveness by reducing the time required to write and understand code and pipelines. Visit the GitLab Duo documentation to learn more about the benefits.
Subscribe to the GitLab Community Newsletter for contributor-focused content and opportunities to level up.
Thanks for your help!
This message was generated automatically. Improve it or delete it.
- React with a